These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1623462)
61. A medical view of research methodology in rehabilitation. Aitken C Int J Rehabil Res; 1987; 10(4 Suppl 5):34-9. PubMed ID: 2972657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. The Catch-22 of appraisals on the quality of observational studies. Groenwold RH; Rovers MM J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1059-60. PubMed ID: 20728044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. The application of total quality management concepts in a service-line cardiovascular program. Kralovec OJ; Huttner CA; Dixon MD Nurs Adm Q; 1991; 15(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 1988847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Assessment of outcomes of health intervention. Jenkins CD Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 1519089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Verifying the validity of outcome. Riegelman R Postgrad Med; 1979 Jun; 65(6):149-51, 153. PubMed ID: 450812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. Donabedian A QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1992 Nov; 18(11):356-60. PubMed ID: 1465293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Psychotherapy outcome. Smith and Glass' conclusions stand up under scrutiny. Landman JT; Dawes RM Am Psychol; 1982 May; 37(5):504-16. PubMed ID: 7125329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. [The reliability of research]. Andersen D Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 Apr; 154(16):1085. PubMed ID: 1523713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Quality assurance: a myth? Sisman B QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1990 Aug; 16(8):278. PubMed ID: 2122352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. A review of outcome studies. Hall DJ Med Rec Health Care Inf J; 1982 Nov; 23(4):93-6, 105-8. PubMed ID: 10262635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Evaluation versus research: outcomes or knowledge? Yerxa EJ Am J Occup Ther; 1984 Jun; 38(6):407-8. PubMed ID: 6430093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. A discussion paper on outcomes for a non-teaching district. Middleton JD Community Med; 1987 Nov; 9(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 3691040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Abolishing the gold standard in hand surgery. Freshwater MF J Hand Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 25(5):982. PubMed ID: 11040317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Fix five star so it measures true quality of care. Stephens M Nephrol News Issues; 2016 Aug; 30(8):39. PubMed ID: 30513171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Quality of care: 2. Quality of care studies and their consequences. Health Services Research Group. CMAJ; 1992 Jul; 147(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 1623462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Assessing quality of care: new twists from managed care. Morreim EH J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 10633279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]