112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1623479)
1. Results of surgical treatment of 1028 cervical cancers studied with volumetry.
Burghardt E; Baltzer J; Tulusan AH; Haas J
Cancer; 1992 Aug; 70(3):648-55. PubMed ID: 1623479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intratumoral lymphatic vessel density and clinicopathologic features of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
Zaganelli FL; Carvalho FM; Almeida BG; Bacchi CE; Goes JC; Calil MA; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21135594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Predictive Model for Parametrial Invasion in Patients With FIGO Stage IB Cervical Cancer: Individualized Approach for Primary Treatment.
Kong TW; Piao X; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 26512782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer: clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic evaluation.
Kasamatsu T; Onda T; Sawada M; Kato T; Ikeda S
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 19398126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer.
Hongladaromp W; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):887-90. PubMed ID: 24568513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage ib-iib cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume.
Trattner M; Graf AH; Lax S; Forstner R; Dandachi N; Haas J; Pickel H; Reich O; Staudach A; Winter R
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11426955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection for cervical cancer.
Denschlag D; Gabriel B; Mueller-Lantzsch C; Tempfer C; Henne K; Gitsch G; Hasenburg A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 15721408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic factors and operative treatment of stages IB to IIB cervical cancer.
Burghardt E; Pickel H; Haas J; Lahousen M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 156(4):988-96. PubMed ID: 3578411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma.
Dai YF; Xu M; Zhong LY; Xie XY; Liu ZD; Yan MX; Yi H; Lin DM
J Int Med Res; 2018 Oct; 46(10):4082-4091. PubMed ID: 29963935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of a surgical-pathologic staging and scoring system for cervical cancer.
Li S; Li X; Zhang Y; Zhou H; Tang F; Jia Y; Hu T; Sun H; Yang R; Chen Y; Cheng X; Lv W; Wu L; Zhou J; Wang S; Huang K; Wang L; Yao Y; Yang Q; Yang X; Zhang Q; Han X; Lin Z; Xing H; Qu P; Cai H; Song X; Tian X; Shen J; Xi L; Li K; Deng D; Wang H; Wang C; Wu M; Zhu T; Chen G; Gao Q; Wang S; Hu J; Kong B; Xie X; Ma D
Oncotarget; 2016 Apr; 7(15):21054-63. PubMed ID: 27014971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A model for prediction of parametrial involvement and feasibility of less radical resection of parametrium in patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chang SJ; Bristow RE; Ryu HS
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jul; 126(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 22516661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical staging and histopathological findings after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.
Mandic A; Novakovic P; Mihajlovic O; Stojiljkovic B; Rajovic J; Davidovic M
J BUON; 2008; 13(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18404786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy.
Ayhan A; Al RA; Baykal C; Demirtas E; Ayhan A; Yüce K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 15086728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
