These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of four techniques combining less invasive approach and navigation. Jenny JY Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10 Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 19298033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study]. Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Schlegel U; Schneider M; Clauss M; Goodfellow JW; Murray DW; Breusch SJ Orthopade; 2005 Nov; 34(11):1094, 1096-102. PubMed ID: 16237558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. Jenny JY; Ciobanu E; Boeri C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():58-62. PubMed ID: 17572633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. Keene G; Simpson D; Kalairajah Y J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 16365119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 10-Year patient satisfaction compared between computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty. Khuangsirikul S; Lekkreusuwan K; Chotanaphuti T Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2016 Dec; 21(1):172-175. PubMed ID: 27973967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. van der List JP; Chawla H; Joskowicz L; Pearle AD Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3482-3495. PubMed ID: 27600634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial. Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional impact of navigation-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Seon JK; Song EK Orthopedics; 2005 Oct; 28(10 Suppl):s1251-4. PubMed ID: 16235449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Process optimization in navigated total knee arthroplasty. Walde TA; Burgdorf D; Walde HJ Orthopedics; 2005 Oct; 28(10 Suppl):s1255-8. PubMed ID: 16235450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Long-Term Results of Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasties Performed by Low-Volume and Less Experienced Surgeon]. Lacko M; Schreierová D; Čellár R; Vaško G Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(3):219-225. PubMed ID: 30257783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigation in minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has no advantage in comparison to a conventional minimally invasive implantation. Weber P; Utzschneider S; Sadoghi P; Pietschmann MF; Ficklscherer A; Jansson V; Müller PE Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Feb; 132(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 21983975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]