These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16235750)

  • 1. Membrane bio-reactor for textile wastewater treatment plant upgrading.
    Lubello C; Gori R
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(4):91-8. PubMed ID: 16235750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Membrane bio-reactor for advanced textile wastewater treatment and reuse.
    Lubello C; Gori R
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 15344781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
    Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upgrading of an activated sludge wastewater treatment plant by adding a moving bed biofilm reactor as pre-treatment and ozonation followed by biofiltration for enhanced COD reduction: design and operation experience.
    Kaindl N
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(11):2710-9. PubMed ID: 21099060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility study to upgrade a textile wastewater treatment plant by a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor for effluent reuse.
    Malpei F; Bonomo L; Rozzi A
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(10):33-9. PubMed ID: 12862214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of membrane solid-liquid separation on design of biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Ramphao M; Wentzel MC; Merritt R; Ekama GA; Young T; Buckley CA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(6):630-46. PubMed ID: 15696540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the efficacy of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in removal of colour and reduction of COD in real textile wastewater.
    Somasiri W; Li XF; Ruan WQ; Jian C
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jun; 99(9):3692-9. PubMed ID: 17719776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some properties of a sequencing batch reactor system for removal of vat dyes.
    Sirianuntapiboon S; Chairattanawan K; Jungphungsukpanich S
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 Jul; 97(10):1243-52. PubMed ID: 16023339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biological treatment and nanofiltration of denim textile wastewater for reuse.
    Sahinkaya E; Uzal N; Yetis U; Dilek FB
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(3):1142-8. PubMed ID: 17976906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upgrading of Florence wastewater treatment plant: co-digestion and nitrogen autotrophic removal.
    Caffaz S; Canziani R; Lubello C; Santianni D
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(4):9-17. PubMed ID: 16235741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of ozone in a pilot-scale plant for textile wastewater pre-treatment: physico-chemical efficiency, degradation by-products identification and environmental toxicity of treated wastewater.
    Somensi CA; Simionatto EL; Bertoli SL; Wisniewski A; Radetski CM
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Mar; 175(1-3):235-40. PubMed ID: 19879043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MBR/RO/ozone processes for TFT-LCD industrial wastewater treatment and recycling.
    Chen TK; Ni CH; Chan YC; Lu MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):411-9. PubMed ID: 16004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phased upgrading for nitrogen removal--a low cost approach.
    Solley D; Armstrong M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):157-63. PubMed ID: 12906285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treating both wastewater and excess sludge with an innovative process.
    He SB; Wang BZ; Wang L; Jiang YF
    J Environ Sci (China); 2003 Nov; 15(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 14758891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of cloth-media filter for membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater.
    Zahid WM; El-Shafai SA
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):2193-8. PubMed ID: 20965722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor and activated sludge system: a pilot plant experiment.
    Di Trapani D; Mannina G; Torregrossa M; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):891-902. PubMed ID: 20182067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.