These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. How good are clinical laboratories? An assessment of current performance. Rej R; Jenny RW Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1210-7; discussion 1218-25. PubMed ID: 1623585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health Care Financing Administration's new proficiency testing rules. Use of a statistical approach to predict long-term performance using the categories 'successful,' 'probation,' and 'suspended'. Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS; Leinweber JE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):770-6. PubMed ID: 1497452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulation of proficiency testing under the March 14 rule. Hinkel C Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1251-3; discussion 1268-72. PubMed ID: 1623589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Proficiency testing from a total quality management perspective. Castañeda-Méndez K Clin Chem; 1992 May; 38(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 1582009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The history of proficiency testing/quality control. Sunderman FW Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1205-9; discussion 1218-25. PubMed ID: 1623584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proficiency testing as a regulatory device: a CAP perspective. Hamlin W Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1234-6; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cholesterol operational process specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing. Westgard JO; Wiebe DA Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1938-44. PubMed ID: 1934469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of computer modeling to predict the magnitude of intralaboratory error tolerated by proposed CDC interlaboratory proficiency testing performance criteria. Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS Clin Chem; 1988 Sep; 34(9):1849-53. PubMed ID: 2843307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proficiency testing linked to the national reference system for the clinical laboratory: a proposal for achieving accuracy. Lasky FD Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1260-7; discussion 1268-72. PubMed ID: 1623591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical laboratory performance on proficiency testing samples--United States, 1994. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1996 Mar; 45(9):193-6. PubMed ID: 8604217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CLIA program; simplifying CLIA regulations relating to accreditation, exemption of laboratories under a state licensure program, proficiency testing, and inspection--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1998 May; 63(93):26722-38. PubMed ID: 10179342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CLIA program; simplifying CLIA regulations relating to accreditation, exemption of laboratories under a state licensure program, proficiency testing, and inspection--HCFA. Correction. Fed Regist; 1998 Jun; 63(114):32699. PubMed ID: 10180277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of new regulations on laboratory testing in physicians' offices. Loschen DJ Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1273-9; discussion 1282-8. PubMed ID: 1623592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the Kodak DT-60 physician's office analyzer as measured by CLIA-88 proposed evaluation criteria. Assessment of demographic and quality assurance factors influencing performance. Meier S; Ehrmeyer S; Laessig R; Woodlief G; Lanphear B; Hassemer D Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 May; 116(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 1580758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]