BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1623717)

  • 1. Acceptability of Norplant-2 rods as a method of family planning.
    Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
    Contraception; 1992 May; 45(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 1623717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience of Thai women in Bangkok with Norplant-2 implants.
    Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Tang-Usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 9866003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptability of Norplant implants for fertility regulation in Singapore.
    Singh K; Viegas OA; Fong YF; Ratnam SS
    Contraception; 1992 Jan; 45(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 1591920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I; Campodonico I; Kiriwat O; Holma P; Diaz S; Wan L; Biswas A; Viegas O; el din Abdalla K; Anant MP; Pavez M; Stern J
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phase III clinical trial with Norplant II (two covered rods): report on five years of use.
    Contraception; 1993 Aug; 48(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 8403909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rates and outcomes of planned pregnancy after use of Norplant capsules, Norplant II rods, or levonorgestrel-releasing or copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz S; Pavéz M; Alvarez F; Brache V; Mishell DR; Lacarra M; McCarthy T; Holma P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 166(4):1208-13. PubMed ID: 1566771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the acceptability of Norplant contraceptive in four patient populations.
    Dugoff L; Jones OW; Allen-Davis J; Hurst BS; Schlaff WD
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8521714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Norplant contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
    Pasquale SA; Brandeis V; Cruz RI; Kelly S; Sweeney M
    Contraception; 1987 Sep; 36(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 3119287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NORPLANT contraceptive implants advancing.
    Segal SJ
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 12279797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Norplant subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Tseng LH; Lee TY; Yang YS; Ko TM; Chuang SM
    Contraception; 1996 Mar; 53(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 8689883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception.
    Buckshee K; Chatterjee P; Dhall GI; Hazra MN; Kodkany BS; Lalitha K; Logambal A; Manchanda P; Nanda UK; RaiChoudhury G
    Contraception; 1995 Apr; 51(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7796589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subdermal contraceptive implants.
    Peralta O; Diaz S; Croxatto H
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 53(1-6):223-6. PubMed ID: 7626459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
    Frank ML; Ditmore JR; Ilegbodu AE; Bateman L; Poindexter AN
    Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
    Peers T; Stevens JE; Graham J; Davey A
    Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 5-year clinical evaluation of Norplant implants in Senegal.
    Ba MG; Moreau JC; Sokal D; Dunson R; Dao B; Kouedou D; Diadhiou F
    Contraception; 1999 Jun; 59(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 10518232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Norplant contraceptive acceptability among women in five Asian countries.
    Krueger SL; Dunson TR; Amatya RN
    Contraception; 1994 Oct; 50(4):349-61. PubMed ID: 7813223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population.
    Cullins VE; Blumenthal PD; Remsburg RE; Huggins GR
    Contraception; 1993 Feb; 47(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8449019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.