BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

802 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16237691)

  • 1. Comparison of cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in 39 recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
    Tanaka K; Lake J; Villamil F; Levy G; Marotta P; Mies S; de Hemptinne B; Moench C
    Liver Transpl; 2005 Nov; 11(11):1395-402. PubMed ID: 16237691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.
    Levy G; Grazi GL; Sanjuan F; Wu Y; Mühlbacher F; Samuel D; Friman S; Jones R; Cantisani G; Villamil F; Cillo U; Clavien PA; Klintmalm G; Otto G; Pollard S; McCormick PA
    Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 17004259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results.
    Krämer BK; Montagnino G; Del Castillo D; Margreiter R; Sperschneider H; Olbricht CJ; Krüger B; Ortuño J; Köhler H; Kunzendorf U; Stummvoll HK; Tabernero JM; Mühlbacher F; Rivero M; Arias M;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 May; 20(5):968-73. PubMed ID: 15741208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
    Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
    Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients.
    Shenoy S; Hardinger KL; Crippin J; Korenblat K; Lisker-Melman M; Lowell JA; Chapman W
    Liver Transpl; 2008 Feb; 14(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 18236391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases.
    Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of immediate switch from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus at first acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.
    Briggs D; Dudley C; Pattison J; Pfeffer P; Salmela K; Rowe P; Tydén G;
    Transplantation; 2003 Jun; 75(12):2058-63. PubMed ID: 12829912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Living donor liver transplant recipients achieve relatively higher immunosuppressant blood levels than cadaveric recipients.
    Trotter JF; Stolpman N; Wachs M; Bak T; Kugelmas M; Kam I; Everson GT
    Liver Transpl; 2002 Mar; 8(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 11910565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin microemulsion in primary SPK transplantation: 3-year results of the Euro-SPK 001 trial.
    Saudek F; Malaise J; Boucek P; Adamec M;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 May; 20 Suppl 2():ii3-10, ii62. PubMed ID: 15814547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of sirolimus plus tacrolimus versus sirolimus plus cyclosporine in high-risk renal allograft recipients: results from an open-label, randomized trial.
    Gaber AO; Kahan BD; Van Buren C; Schulman SL; Scarola J; Neylan JF;
    Transplantation; 2008 Nov; 86(9):1187-95. PubMed ID: 19005398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: the EURO-SPK 3-year results.
    Malaise J; Saudek F; Boucek P; Adamec M; Van Ophem D; Squifflet JP;
    Transplant Proc; 2005; 37(6):2843-5. PubMed ID: 16182828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].
    Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring C2 level predicts exposure in maintenance lung transplant patients receiving the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral).
    Jaksch P; Kocher A; Neuhauser P; Sarahrudi K; Seweryn J; Wisser W; Klepetko W
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Aug; 24(8):1076-80. PubMed ID: 16102443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: the Canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin A trial: 1-year follow-up.
    Greig P; Lilly L; Scudamore C; Erb S; Yoshida E; Kneteman N; Bain V; Ghent C; Marotta P; Grant D; Wall W; Tchervenkov J; Barkun J; Roy A; Marleau D; McAlister V; Peltekian K
    Liver Transpl; 2003 Jun; 9(6):587-95. PubMed ID: 12783400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of azathioprine versus cyclosporine-based therapy in primary haplo-identical live-donor kidney transplantation: a 20-year experience.
    Gheith OA; Bakr MA; Fouda MA; Shokeir AA; Sobh M; Ghoneim M
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2008 Jul; 19(4):564-70. PubMed ID: 18580014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FK506 (tacrolimus) compared with cyclosporine for primary immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation. Results from the U.S. Multicenter Trial.
    McDiarmid SV; Busuttil RW; Ascher NL; Burdick J; D'Alessandro AM; Esquivel C; Kalayoglu M; Klein AS; Marsh JW; Miller CM
    Transplantation; 1995 Feb; 59(4):530-6. PubMed ID: 7533345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of early cyclosporine levels on kidney allograft rejection.
    Johnson EM; Canafax DM; Gillingham KJ; Humar A; Pandian K; Kerr SR; Najarian JS; Matas AJ
    Clin Transplant; 1997 Dec; 11(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 9408683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin A in renal transplantation: three-year observational results.
    Krämer BK; Del Castillo D; Margreiter R; Sperschneider H; Olbricht CJ; Ortuño J; Sester U; Kunzendorf U; Dietl KH; Bonomini V; Rigotti P; Ronco C; Tabernero JM; Rivero M; Banas B; Mühlbacher F; Arias M; Montagnino G;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Jul; 23(7):2386-92. PubMed ID: 18258740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of lis2t, a multicenter, randomized study comparing cyclosporine microemulsion with C2 monitoring and tacrolimus with C0 monitoring in de novo liver transplantation.
    Levy G; Villamil F; Samuel D; Sanjuan F; Grazi GL; Wu Y; Marotta P; Boillot O; Muehlbacher F; Klintmalm G;
    Transplantation; 2004 Jun; 77(11):1632-8. PubMed ID: 15201658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of cyclosporine for liver transplantation.
    Lilly LB; Grant D
    Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):267S-270S. PubMed ID: 15041351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.