These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16238848)

  • 1. Factors affecting the acceptance of expert advice.
    Van Swol LM; Sniezek JA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2005 Sep; 44(Pt 3):443-61. PubMed ID: 16238848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust, Confidence, and Expertise in a Judge-Advisor System.
    Sniezek JA; Van Swol LM
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Mar; 84(2):288-307. PubMed ID: 11277673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond the black letter of the law: an empirical study of an individual judge's decision process for civil commitment hearings.
    Bursztajn HJ; Hamm RM; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 9148885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disentangling the effects of advisor consensus and advice proximity.
    Wanzel SK; Schultze T; Schulz-Hardt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1669-1675. PubMed ID: 28287767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.
    Pescetelli N; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):507-526. PubMed ID: 33001684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expert witness testimony: A trial judge's perspective.
    Weinstein JB
    Neurol Clin; 1999 May; 17(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 10196416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To you I am listening: perceived competence of advisors influences judgment and decision-making via recruitment of the amygdala.
    Schilbach L; Eickhoff SB; Schultze T; Mojzisch A; Vogeley K
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(3):189-202. PubMed ID: 23485131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating Incomplete Information With Imperfect Advice.
    Vélez N; Gweon H
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Apr; 11(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 30414253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--legal evaluation of medical expert opinion].
    Schlund GH
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):596-602. PubMed ID: 9064930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender bias and judicial decisions of undue influence in testamentary challenges.
    Recupero PR; Christopher PP; Strong DR; Price M; Harms SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 25770281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A balanced opinion? Considering the role of the external clinical advisor in ACC processes.
    Dickson A; Manning J
    N Z Med J; 2020 May; 133(1515):97-103. PubMed ID: 32438381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When Advisors' True Intentions Are in Question. How Do Bank Customers Cope with Uncertainty in Financial Consultancies?
    Mackinger B; Jonas E; Mühlberger C
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1112. PubMed ID: 28713314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Code of civil procedure for medical workers--evidence of fact finding and efficacy of judgment].
    Kageyama K; Jimba K; Hashimoto S
    Masui; 2013 May; 62(5):623-8. PubMed ID: 23772542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Inability to Ignore Useless Advice.
    Schultze T; Mojzisch A; Schulz-Hardt S
    Exp Psychol; 2017 May; 64(3):170-183. PubMed ID: 28633625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The effects of judge's roles on probability judgment].
    Minami M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Jun; 68(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 9278959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can a judge's preference for one body of medical opinion justify a finding of negligence?
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8395):177. PubMed ID: 6146082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Young children heed advice selectively.
    Rakoczy H; Ehrling C; Harris PL; Schultze T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Oct; 138():71-87. PubMed ID: 26037403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
    Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.