These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16238999)

  • 1. Rail human factors: Past, present and future.
    Wilson JR; Norris BJ
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Nov; 36(6):649-60. PubMed ID: 16238999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding safety and production risks in rail engineering planning and protection.
    Wilson JR; Ryan B; Schock A; Ferreira P; Smith S; Pitsopoulos J
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jul; 52(7):774-90. PubMed ID: 19562589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Keeping rail on track: preliminary findings on safety culture in Australian rail.
    Blewett V; Rainbird S; Dorrian J; Paterson J; Cattani M
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4230-6. PubMed ID: 22317370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rail signallers' assessments of their satisfaction with different shift work systems.
    Ryan B; Wilson JR; Sharples S; Kenvyn F; Clarke T
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1656-71. PubMed ID: 18941973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More than meets the eye: Using cognitive work analysis to identify design requirements for future rail level crossing systems.
    Salmon PM; Lenné MG; Read GJ; Mulvihill CM; Cornelissen M; Walker GH; Young KL; Stevens N; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt B():312-22. PubMed ID: 26143077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation into issues of passenger egress in Ladbroke Grove rail disaster.
    Weyman A; O'Hara R; Jackson A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Nov; 36(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 16122692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The personal and contextual factors that affect customer experience during rail service failures and the implications for service design.
    Ross T; May A; Cockbill SA
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103096. PubMed ID: 32342887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes and opinions of railway signallers and related staff, using the Rail Ergonomics Questionnaire (REQUEST).
    Ryan B; Wilson JR; Sharples S; Clarke T
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):230-8. PubMed ID: 18538744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding human factors in rail engineering: re-analysis of detailed, qualitative data on functions and risks.
    Ryan B; Wilsona JR; Schock A
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4237-45. PubMed ID: 22317371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing simulator tools for rail research: the case study of a train driving microworld.
    Naweed A; Hockey GR; Clarke SD
    Appl Ergon; 2013 May; 44(3):445-54. PubMed ID: 23107003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sounding the warning bells: the need for a systems approach to understanding behaviour at rail level crossings.
    Read GJ; Salmon PM; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):764-74. PubMed ID: 23473696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological factors for driver distraction and inattention in the Australian and New Zealand rail industry.
    Naweed A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():193-204. PubMed ID: 24076301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driver performance modelling and its practical application to railway safety.
    Hamilton WI; Clarke T
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Nov; 36(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 16182232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rail safety and rail privatisation in Japan.
    Evans AW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1296-301. PubMed ID: 20441845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors.
    Wilson JR
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jan; 45(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 23684119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A scientific providing for the system of hygienic optimization and anti-epidemic safety of rail ridership].
    Vil'k MF; Korotich LP; Polyakova V
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23805688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving fit to work assessments for rail safety workers by exploring work limitations.
    Boschman JS; Hulshof CT; Frings-Dresen MH; Sluiter JK
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2016 Jul; 89(5):803-11. PubMed ID: 26867594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the visual skills and strategies of train drivers in the urban rail environment.
    Naweed A; Balakrishnan G
    Work; 2014 Jan; 47(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24004760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Current aspects of the state and improvement of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of workers and passengers of Russian railways].
    Kas'kov IuN; Farkhatdinov GA; Podkorytov IuI; Khusnutdinova NSh
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (5):24-6. PubMed ID: 24340904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The characteristics of railway service disruption: implications for disruption management.
    Golightly D; Dadashi N
    Ergonomics; 2017 Mar; 60(3):307-320. PubMed ID: 27215348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.