These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Ten- to 12-year followup of the Insall-Burstein I total knee prosthesis. Thadani PJ; Vince KG; Ortaaslan SG; Blackburn DC; Cudiamat CV Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Nov; (380):17-29. PubMed ID: 11064969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. Berger RA; Meneghini RM; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Della Valle CJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 May; 87(5):999-1006. PubMed ID: 15866962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. Callaghan JJ; Squire MW; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 May; 82(5):705-11. PubMed ID: 10819281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Hernigou P; Deschamps G J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 14996875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. Argenson JN; Parratte S; Ashour A; Saintmard B; Aubaniac JM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Apr; 94(7):638-44. PubMed ID: 22488620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. Argenson JN; Blanc G; Aubaniac JM; Parratte S J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 May; 95(10):905-9. PubMed ID: 23677357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years. Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 14996878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. Diduch DR; Insall JN; Scott WN; Scuderi GR; Font-Rodriguez D J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Apr; 79(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 9111404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten- to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective study from a non-designer group. Lisowski LA; Meijer LI; van den Bekerom MP; Pilot P; Lisowski AE Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98 B(10 Supple B):41-47. PubMed ID: 27694515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50s. Parratte S; Argenson JN; Pearce O; Pauly V; Auquier P; Aubaniac JM J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 19258611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. Argenson JN; Chevrol-Benkeddache Y; Aubaniac JM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Dec; 84(12):2235-9. PubMed ID: 12473714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medium term results of the Miller-Galante knee arthroplasty with 10 year survivorship. Rachha R; Veravalli K; Sood M Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Apr; 79(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 23821972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]