These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16240377)

  • 1. Use of CUSUM and Shewhart charts to monitor regional trends of birth defect reports in New York State.
    Babcock GD; Talbot TO; Rogerson PA; Forand SP
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):669-78. PubMed ID: 16240377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
    Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of seasonal variation of birth defects in Atlanta.
    Siffel C; Alverson CJ; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):655-62. PubMed ID: 16240376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State.
    Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK; Hwang SA; Gensburg LJ
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a web-based integrated birth defects surveillance system in New York State.
    Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Le LH; Steen PM; Babcock GD; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 18849767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare.
    Noyez L
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Sep; 9(3):494-9. PubMed ID: 19509097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
    Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sources of variability in birth defects prevalence rates.
    Hobbs CA; Hopkins SE; Simmons CJ
    Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S8-S13. PubMed ID: 11745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Process of and problems in changing a birth defects registry reporting system.
    Druschel C; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross P
    Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S30-6. PubMed ID: 11745842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
    Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS): effectiveness of a passive birth defects registry system.
    Fox DJ; Druschel CM
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):604-8. PubMed ID: 14703781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Completeness of registration of oral clefts in a medical birth registry: a population-based study.
    Kubon C; Sivertsen A; Vindenes HA; Abyholm F; Wilcox A; Lie RT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(12):1453-7. PubMed ID: 17851803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in the birth prevalence of selected birth defects after grain fortification with folic acid in the United States: findings from a multi-state population-based study.
    Canfield MA; Collins JS; Botto LD; Williams LJ; Mai CT; Kirby RS; Pearson K; Devine O; Mulinare J;
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):679-89. PubMed ID: 16240378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the hospital discharge diagnoses index and the birth certificate as sources of information on birth defects.
    Hexter AC; Harris JA; Roeper P; Croen LA; Krueger P; Gant D
    Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 2113690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of birth certificate data for detecting facial cleft defects in Arkansas children.
    Green HG; Nelson CJ; Gaylor DW; Holson JF
    Cleft Palate J; 1979 Apr; 16(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 284865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations.
    Cooper WO; Hernandez-Diaz S; Gideon P; Dyer SM; Hall K; Dudley J; Cevasco M; Thompson AB; Ray WA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 May; 17(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 18081215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random error and undercounting in birth defects surveillance data: implications for inference.
    Correa-Villaseñor A; Satten GA; Rolka H; Langlois P; Devine O
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 14703782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
    Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
    Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in the prevalence of human birth defects: a population-based study.
    Lary JM; Paulozzi LJ
    Teratology; 2001 Nov; 64(5):237-51. PubMed ID: 11745830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National rates of birth defects among hospitalized newborns.
    Bird TM; Hobbs CA; Cleves MA; Tilford JM; Robbins JM
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):762-9. PubMed ID: 17063529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.