These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16240377)

  • 21. Including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring: Experience of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program.
    Cragan JD; Gilboa SM
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2009 Jan; 85(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 19089857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visualization and interpretation of birth defects data using linked micromap plots.
    Gebreab SY; Gillies RR; Munger RG; Symanzik J
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Feb; 82(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 18050336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Design and performance of statistical process control charts applied to estrous detection efficiency.
    de Vries A; Conlin BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Jun; 86(6):1970-84. PubMed ID: 12836932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring the seasonality of birth defects in the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry.
    Caton AR
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2012 Jun; 94(6):424-37. PubMed ID: 22473628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CUSUM analyses of time-interval data for online radiation monitoring.
    Luo P; Devol TA; Sharp JL
    Health Phys; 2012 Jun; 102(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 22549320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementing a web-based case reporting and communication system among hospitals reporting to the birth defects registry in New York State.
    Steen PM; Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Druschel CM
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E11-6. PubMed ID: 18849768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Follow-up survey of parents of children with major birth defects in New York State.
    Sharpe-Stimac M; Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 70(9):597-602. PubMed ID: 15368559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1998-2004.
    Johnson CY; Honein MA; Hobbs CA; Rasmussen SA;
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Sep; 29(9):833-9. PubMed ID: 19455588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Renal agenesis and dysgenesis: are they increasing?
    Stroup NE; Edmonds L; O'Brien TR
    Teratology; 1990 Oct; 42(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 2256002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The methodology of the Utah Birth Defect Network: congenital heart defects as an illustration.
    Feldkamp M; Macleod L; Young L; Lecheminant K; Carey JC
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):693-9. PubMed ID: 16240379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Completeness of state administrative databases for surveillance of congenital heart disease.
    Cronk CE; Malloy ME; Pelech AN; Miller RE; Meyer SA; Cowell M; McCarver DG
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):597-603. PubMed ID: 14703780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Birth defects ascertainment in the Philippines.
    Padilla- CD; Cutiongco EM; Sia JM
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003; 34 Suppl 3():239-43. PubMed ID: 15906745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of surveillance methods for small incidence rates.
    Sego LH; Woodall WH; Reynolds MR
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1225-47. PubMed ID: 17879266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Birth defects surveillance in Florida: infant death certificates as a case ascertainment source.
    Tanner JP; Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2010 Dec; 88(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 20842648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maximum likelihood estimation of the proportion of congenital malformations using double registration systems.
    Lie RT; Heuch I; Irgens LM
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):433-44. PubMed ID: 8068843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process-control charts.
    Lu Y; Mathur AK; Blunt BA; Gluer CC; Will AS; Fuerst TP; Jergas MD; Andriano KN; Cummings SR; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 May; 11(5):626-37. PubMed ID: 9157777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time trends in the prevalence of birth defects in Texas 1999-2007: real or artifactual?
    Langlois PH; Marengo LK; Canfield MA
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Oct; 91(10):902-17. PubMed ID: 21987468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality control of birth defect registry data: a case study.
    Schulman J; Hahn JA
    Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 8434104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linking teratogen information service and birth defects registry databases to improve knowledge of birth defect status.
    Archer NP; Langlois PH; Case AP; Wolfe LJ
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Feb; 76(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 16463273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Environmental epidemiology at the Medical Birth Registry of Norway; strengths and limitations.
    Lie RT
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 1997 Jun; 5(2):57-9. PubMed ID: 9208158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.