207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16240398)
1. Cost-effectiveness of liquid-based cytology with or without hybrid-capture II HPV test compared with conventional Pap smears: a study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology.
Cochand-Priollet B; Cartier I; de Cremoux P; Le Galès C; Ziol M; Molinié V; Petitjean A; Dosda A; Merea E; Biaggi A; Gouget I; Arkwright S; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Vielh P; Coste J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Nov; 33(5):338-43. PubMed ID: 16240398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture in the triage of women with repeated abnormal pap smears before colposcopy referral.
Fait G; Kupferminc MJ; Daniel Y; Geva E; Ron IG; Lessing JB; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11063640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for cervical cancer in high-risk populations: DNA pap test or Hybrid Capture II test alone?
Miranda Pereira SM; Castelo A; Makabe S; Utagawa ML; Di Loreto C; Sakamoto Maeda MY; Marques JA; Santoro CL; Filho AL; Das Dores GB
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2006 Jan; 25(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16306782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of HPV-based assays with Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening in Morelos State, Mexico.
Salmerón J; Lazcano-Ponce E; Lorincz A; Hernández M; Hernández P; Leyva A; Uribe M; Manzanares H; Antunez A; Carmona E; Ronnett BM; Sherman ME; Bishai D; Ferris D; Flores Y; Yunes E; Shah KV
Cancer Causes Control; 2003 Aug; 14(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 12948281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Descriptive Study of Different Methods of Cervical Cancer Screening among Ever-Married Women in 35-Year and 45-Year Cohorts in Kalutara District, Sri Lanka.
Mapitigama N; Moonesinghe LN; Punchihewa R; Perera C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 May; 24(5):1487-1493. PubMed ID: 37247267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing PAP smear cytology, aided visual inspection, screening colposcopy, cervicography and HPV testing as optional screening tools in Latin America. Study design and baseline data of the LAMS study.
Syrjänen K; Naud P; Derchain S; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Hammes LS; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian L; Braganca J; Arlindo FC; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(5):3469-80. PubMed ID: 16101165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
Cox JT
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design and methods of the evaluation of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Mexico: The Morelos HPV Study.
Flores Y; Shah K; Lazcano E; Hernández M; Bishai D; Ferris DG; Lörincz A; Hernández P; Salmerón J;
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 12216521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical value of digene hybrid capture HPV DNA testing in a referral-based population with abnormal pap smears.
Recio FO; Sahai Srivastava BI; Wong C; Hempling RE; Eltabbakh GH; Piver MS
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9641214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the Roche AMPLICOR human papillomavirus (HPV) test in prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with abnormal PAP smear.
Monsonego J; Bohbot JM; Pollini G; Krawec C; Vincent C; Merignargues I; Haroun F; Sednaoui P; Monfort L; Dachez R; Syrjänen K
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Oct; 99(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 16023184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing: a pooled analysis using the data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Guo HQ; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Chen W; Cao J; Jiang Y; Zhao FH; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24631450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the human papillomavirus test and Papanicolaou smear as a second screening method for women with minor cytological abnormalities.
Andersson S; Dillner L; Elfgren K; Mints M; Persson M; Rylander E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Oct; 84(10):996-1000. PubMed ID: 16167918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compare with physician-collected cervical samples and cytology for cervical cancer screening in developing countries?
Bhatla N; Dar L; Patro AR; Kumar P; Kriplani A; Gulati A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR; Sreenivas V; Shah KV; Gravitt PE
Cancer Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 33(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 19931499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of Pap smear, cervical biopsy, and clinical follow-up with an HPV typing microarray system.
Nuovo GJ; Bartholomew D; Jung WW; Han IK; Um T; Grabarz DF; Lee DJ; McCabe RT
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 17(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 18382353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
