164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16240736)
1. A normative justification for distinguishing the ethics of clinical research from the ethics of medical care.
Litton P; Miller FG
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):566-74. PubMed ID: 16240736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Doctor vs. scientist?
Jansen LA
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):3. PubMed ID: 18457215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bench to bedside: mapping the moral terrain of clinical research.
Joffe S; Miller FG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):30-42. PubMed ID: 18457227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical investigator as fiduciary: discarding a misguided idea.
Morreim EH
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):586-98. PubMed ID: 16240738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician/investigator's obligation to patients participating in research: the case of placebo controlled trials.
Glass KC; Waring D
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):575-85. PubMed ID: 16240737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflating scientific with clinical considerations.
van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):58-9. PubMed ID: 19998198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical perspective on placebo research: looking back, looking forward.
Dworkin RW
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):54-5. PubMed ID: 19998196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Vulnerability as the inability of researchers to act in the best interest of a subject.
VanderWalde AM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):65-6; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reviewing the unsubstantiated claims for the methodological superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials: reply to open peer commentaries.
Howick J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):W5-7. PubMed ID: 19998178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Moral conflict in clinical trials.
Merritt M
Ethics; 2005 Jan; 115(2):306-30. PubMed ID: 16127863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contextualizing clinical research: the epistemological role of clinical equipoise.
Anderson JA
Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(4):269-88. PubMed ID: 19404770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research, medicine, and "placebos".
Moerman DE
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):64-5. PubMed ID: 19998201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Strengthening Howick's argument against the alleged superiority of placebo-controlled trials.
Rennie S; Stürmer T
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):62-4. PubMed ID: 19998200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Questioning the methodologic superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials.
Howick J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):34-48. PubMed ID: 19998192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What do Islamic institutional fatwas say about medical and research confidentiality and breach of confidentiality?
Alahmad G; Dierickx K
Dev World Bioeth; 2012 Aug; 12(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 22702346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research in the physician's office: navigating the ethical minefield.
Snyder L; Mueller PS
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):23-5. PubMed ID: 18457224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancing informed consent in clinical trials and exploring resistances to disclosing adverse clinical trial results.
Banja JD; Dunlop B
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):39-41. PubMed ID: 19998159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who's in control of the choice of control?
Anderson JA
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):60-2. PubMed ID: 19998199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The alchemy of informed consent.
Hull RT
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12235685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
