These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16240788)

  • 1. Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1274-7. PubMed ID: 16240788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility in virtual restaurants.
    Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2418. PubMed ID: 27794329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informational masking with speech-on-speech intelligibility: Pupil response and time-course of learning.
    Versfeld NJ; Lie S; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Apr; 149(4):2353. PubMed ID: 33940918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice.
    Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1295-300. PubMed ID: 8408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.
    Best V; Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3103-10. PubMed ID: 22501083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Drullman R; Bronkhorst AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
    Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1906-16. PubMed ID: 12002873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
    Smits C; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Energetic and informational masking in a simulated restaurant environment.
    Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():511-8. PubMed ID: 23716258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.