210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16240962)
1. The marginal quality of luted ceramic inserts in bovine teeth and ceramic inlays in extracted molars after occlusal loading.
Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Rousson V
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 16240962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.
Ferrari M; Dagostin A; Fabianelli A
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 12686290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ
Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays.
Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Bertelli E; Monticelli F; Grandini S; Ferrari M
J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 15892362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro.
Frankenberger R; Hehn J; Hajtó J; Krämer N; Naumann M; Koch A; Roggendorf MJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 22358378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays.
Müller V; Friedl KH; Friedl K; Hahnel S; Handel G; Lang R
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):607-612. PubMed ID: 27507168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
Bott B; Hannig M
Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements.
Aschenbrenner CM; Lang R; Handel G; Behr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 21327799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.
Hahn P; Attin T; Gröfke M; Hellwig E
Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 11257290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of a simplified application technique for ceramic inlays on the margin quality.
Clotten S; Blunck U; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 11725681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials.
Schenke F; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.
Sandoval MJ; Rocca GT; Krejci I; Mandikos M; Dietschi D
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2167-77. PubMed ID: 25877233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
