170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16241107)
1. Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses.
Barker FG; Carter BS
Neurosurg Focus; 2005 Oct; 19(4):E5. PubMed ID: 16241107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
Engberg S
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.
Crumley ET; Wiebe N; Cramer K; Klassen TP; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].
Eliasson M
Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(22):2726-8. PubMed ID: 10900892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: how should they be performed, evaluated and used?].
Gisbert JP; Bonfil X
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Mar; 27(3):129-49. PubMed ID: 14998465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.
O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C
Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: an annotated bibliography and critical appraisal of published systematic reviews and metaanalyses.
Jadad AR; Booker L; Gauld M; Kakuma R; Boyle M; Cunningham CE; Kim M; Schachar R
Can J Psychiatry; 1999 Dec; 44(10):1025-35. PubMed ID: 10637682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary on Sood et al.: "Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching".
Lao L
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug; 11(4):723-4. PubMed ID: 16131299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.
Gagnier JJ; Moher D; Boon H; Beyene J; Bombardier C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jul; 12():111. PubMed ID: 22846171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Great expectations.
Nat Neurosci; 2001 Dec; 4(12):1151. PubMed ID: 11723453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching.
Sood A; Sood R; Bauer BA; Ebbert JO
J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug; 11(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 16131298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
Watine J
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updated method guidelines for cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews and metaanalyses.
Ghogomu EA; Maxwell LJ; Buchbinder R; Rader T; Pardo Pardo J; Johnston RV; Christensen RD; Rutjes AW; Winzenberg TM; Singh JA; Zanoli G; Wells GA; Tugwell P;
J Rheumatol; 2014 Feb; 41(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 24293581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Types of clinical studies. Systematic reviews.
Varandas T; Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 25(2):233-46. PubMed ID: 16673653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metaanalysis for the obstetrician-gynecologist.
Thacker SB; Peterson HB; Stroup DF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 174(5):1403-7. PubMed ID: 9065103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ultimate search engine?
Nat Cell Biol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 15632938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions I: Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature.
O'Connor AM; Anderson KM; Goodell CK; Sargeant JM
Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():28-38. PubMed ID: 24905994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
