These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16241875)

  • 1. Performance standards for continuous glucose monitors.
    Hayter PG; Sharma M; Dunka L; Stout P; Price DA; Horwitz DL; Marhoul J; Vaez-Zadeh S
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Oct; 7(5):721-6. PubMed ID: 16241875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time continuous glucose monitor use and patient selection: what have we learned and where are we going?
    Wilson DM; Block J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Oct; 7(5):788-91. PubMed ID: 16241884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of continuous glucose monitoring by GlucoWatch Biographer in a cohort of diabetic children and adolescents under real-life conditions.
    Bozzetti V; Viscardi M; Bonfanti R; Azzinari A; Meschi F; Bognetti E; Chiumello G
    Pediatr Diabetes; 2003 Mar; 4(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 14655524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous glucose monitoring.
    Med Lett Drugs Ther; 2007 Feb; 49(1254):13-5. PubMed ID: 17285091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control Solutions for Blood Glucose Meters: A Neglected Opportunity for Reliable Measurements?
    Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):723-4. PubMed ID: 26002834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Evaluation of Two CE-Marked Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):934-5. PubMed ID: 25901021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring System Exceeds International Accuracy Standards.
    Brazg RL; Klaff LJ; Sussman AM
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1414-1415. PubMed ID: 27271844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent System Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Salzsieder E; Berg S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 10(1):238-9. PubMed ID: 26394775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring: the GlucoDay system.
    Maran A; Poscia A
    Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2002 Dec; 15(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 12678463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDA approves new Glucose Monitoring System.
    Klonoff DC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(3):349. PubMed ID: 11475279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [THE VERIFICATION OF ANALYTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE MODELS OF GLUCOMETERS].
    Timofeev AV; Khaibulina ET; Mamonov RA; Gorst KA
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2016 Jan; 61(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 27183728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blood glucose meters.
    Wahowiak L
    Diabetes Forecast; 2014 Jan; 67(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 25868294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous glucose monitoring: an overview of today's technologies and their clinical applications.
    Heinemann L; Koschinsky T
    Int J Clin Pract Suppl; 2002 Jul; (129):75-9. PubMed ID: 12166611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation of measured values associated with different lots of sensors for the FreeStyle Libre.
    Okada J; Yamada E; Saito T; Okada S; Yamada M
    J Diabetes; 2018 Dec; 10(12):986-987. PubMed ID: 29968342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of Blood Glucose Meters in the Low-Glucose Range: Current Evaluations Indicate That it is not Sufficient From a Clinical Point of View.
    Heinemann L; Zijlstra E; Pleus S; Freckmann G
    Diabetes Care; 2015 Sep; 38(9):e139-40. PubMed ID: 26180110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance for blood glucose monitoring. The balance of feasibility and standards.
    Walker EA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 28(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 8451217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-oriented criteria for evaluation of self-monitoring of blood glucose devices.
    Church LB; Glauber HS
    Diabetes Care; 1989 Sep; 12(8):594-5. PubMed ID: 2776589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous Glucose Monitors: The Long and Winding Road To Acceptance, Coverage.
    Wolinsky H
    Manag Care; 2018 Jul; 27(7):21-24. PubMed ID: 29989896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [CGM-Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Statement of the Austrian Diabetes Association (Update 2019)].
    Schütz-Fuhrmann I; Rami-Merhar B; Hofer SE; Fröhlich-Reiterer E; Mader J; Stadler M; Bischof M; Zlamal-Fortunat S; Laimer M; Weitgasser R
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2019 May; 131(Suppl 1):119-123. PubMed ID: 30980171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preanalytic and analytic accuracy: toward more realistic and meaningful self-monitoring of blood glucose submissions for regulatory approval.
    Cembrowski GS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):1014-6. PubMed ID: 21880246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.