576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16242181)
1. Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility.
Evenson DP; Wixon R
Theriogenology; 2006 Mar; 65(5):979-91. PubMed ID: 16242181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®).
Evenson DP
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():147-64. PubMed ID: 22992911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Redefining the relationship between sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay and outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.
Payne JF; Raburn DJ; Couchman GM; Price TM; Jamison MG; Walmer DK
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 16084876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm.
Chohan KR; Griffin JT; Lafromboise M; De Jonge CJ; Carrell DT
J Androl; 2006; 27(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16400078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
Virro MR; Larson-Cook KL; Evenson DP
Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1289-95. PubMed ID: 15136092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic tool in the human fertility clinic.
Boe-Hansen GB; Fedder J; Ersbøll AK; Christensen P
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1576-82. PubMed ID: 16543258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA(®)) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility.
Evenson DP
Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Jun; 169():56-75. PubMed ID: 26919909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.
Lin MH; Kuo-Kuang Lee R; Li SH; Lu CH; Sun FJ; Hwu YM
Fertil Steril; 2008 Aug; 90(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 17904130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental toxicants cause sperm DNA fragmentation as detected by the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA).
Evenson DP; Wixon R
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):532-7. PubMed ID: 15987647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Sperm DNA integrity as diagnosis and prognosis element of male fertility].
Sergerie M; Bleau G; Teulé R; Daudin M; Bujan L
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Mar; 33(3):89-101. PubMed ID: 15848079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI.
Bungum M; Humaidan P; Spano M; Jepson K; Bungum L; Giwercman A
Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1401-8. PubMed ID: 15117894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome.
Bungum M; Humaidan P; Axmon A; Spano M; Bungum L; Erenpreiss J; Giwercman A
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 16921163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential.
Gillan L; Evans G; Maxwell WM
Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):445-57. PubMed ID: 15626410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART.
Bungum M; Spanò M; Humaidan P; Eleuteri P; Rescia M; Giwercman A
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jan; 23(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 17986484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome.
Benchaib M; Lornage J; Mazoyer C; Lejeune H; Salle B; François Guerin J
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17074327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of deoxyribonucleic acid damage on fertilization and pregnancy.
Henkel R; Hajimohammad M; Stalf T; Hoogendijk C; Mehnert C; Menkveld R; Gips H; Schill WB; Kruger TF
Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr; 81(4):965-72. PubMed ID: 15066449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using flow cytometry and other techniques.
Evenson DP; Kasperson K; Wixon RL
Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2007; 65():93-113. PubMed ID: 17644957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toluidine blue cytometry test for sperm DNA conformation: comparison with the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure and TUNEL assays.
Erenpreiss J; Jepson K; Giwercman A; Tsarev I; Erenpreisa J; Spano M
Hum Reprod; 2004 Oct; 19(10):2277-82. PubMed ID: 15271869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications.
Erenpreiss J; Bungum M; Spano M; Elzanaty S; Orbidans J; Giwercman A
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2061-4. PubMed ID: 16684843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural damage to nuclear DNA in mammalian spermatozoa: its evaluation techniques and relationship with male infertility.
Fraser L
Pol J Vet Sci; 2004; 7(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 15633792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
