These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16242198)

  • 1. Three- to eight-month-old infants' catching under monocular and binocular vision.
    van Hof P; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Feb; 25(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 16242198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of intermittent visual samples over time and between the eyes.
    Bennett S; Ashford D; Rioja N; Coull J; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2006 Nov; 38(6):439-50. PubMed ID: 17138528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monocular and binocular control of human interceptive movements.
    Servos P; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Mar; 119(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 9521540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action.
    Gray R; Regan D; Castaneda B; Sieffert R
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1676-94. PubMed ID: 16169039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intermittent vision and one-handed catching: the temporal limits of binocular and monocular integration.
    Bennett S; Ashford D; Elliott D
    Motor Control; 2003 Oct; 7(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 14999135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gaze changes with binocular versus monocular viewing in age-related macular degeneration.
    Kabanarou SA; Crossland MD; Bellmann C; Rees A; Culham LE; Rubin GS
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2251-8. PubMed ID: 16996593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monocular versus binocular vision in postural control.
    Isotalo E; Kapoula Z; Feret PH; Gauchon K; Zamfirescu F; Gagey PM
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Mar; 31(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 15041048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecological relevance of stereopsis in one-handed ball-catching.
    Lenoir M; Musch E; La Grange N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Oct; 89(2):495-508. PubMed ID: 10597587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses.
    Melmoth DR; Finlay AL; Morgan MJ; Grant S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3711-20. PubMed ID: 19339741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement.
    Coull J; Weir PL; Tremblay L; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2000 Dec; 32(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 11114228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.
    Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slant cues are processed with different latencies for the online control of movement.
    van Mierlo CM; Louw S; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):25.1-8. PubMed ID: 19757964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time.
    Greenwald HS; Knill DC; Saunders JA
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):1975-89. PubMed ID: 15820516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Action control: independent effects of memory and monocular viewing on reaching accuracy.
    Westwood DA; Robertson C; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 15780459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic reaching in infants during binocular and monocular viewing.
    Ekberg TL; Rosander K; von Hofsten C; Olsson U; Soska KC; Adolph KE
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 229(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 23771585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring young infants' sensitivity to height-in-the-picture-plane by contrasting monocular and binocular preferential-looking.
    Tsuruhara A; Corrow S; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK; Yonas A
    Dev Psychobiol; 2014 Jan; 56(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 23280555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infants' responsiveness to pictorial depth cues in preferential-reaching studies: a meta-analysis.
    Kavsek M; Granrud CE; Yonas A
    Infant Behav Dev; 2009 Jun; 32(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 19328557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of monocular and binocular visual cues for postural control in children.
    Barela JA; Sanches M; Lopes AG; Razuk M; Moraes R
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22004694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.