These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1624269)

  • 1. Ragona v. Preate.
    Griffith DB
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 1624269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ragona v. Preate.
    Pennsylvania. Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1990 Nov; 6(1991):202-19. PubMed ID: 12041327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rodas v. ErkenBrack.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 11644071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complaint for declaratory relief in Rodas case.
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):499-501. PubMed ID: 11644076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prisoner's right to refuse treatment outweighs physician's duty to treat.
    Drescher GP
    J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(3-4):400-1. PubMed ID: 11654964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dee Ross v. Hilltop Rehabilitation Hospital.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 11644322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In re Bayer.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Courts entangled in feeding tube controversies.
    Mishkin B
    Nutr Clin Pract; 1986 Aug; 1(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 11652485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues.
    Snyder L
    J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Jane Doe.
    Cameron JC
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 11644330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of incarceration on the right to die.
    Jamieson SM
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 11650188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
    Matthews MA
    Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Woman who fought to die is back in court.
    Chambers M
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Feb; ():25. PubMed ID: 11646507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In re Rodas.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):471-80. PubMed ID: 11644070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bouvia v. Superior Court (Glenchur).
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
    Wests Calif Report; 1986 Apr; 225():297-308. PubMed ID: 11648237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A legal test of the right to die.
    Malcolm AH
    N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():9. PubMed ID: 11646513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical and legal issues in the use of TPN.
    Shapiro RS
    Nutrition; 1990; 6(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 2134564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The legal logic of euthanasia.
    Uhlmann MM
    First Things; 1996; 64():39-43. PubMed ID: 11654467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paul E. Brophy is dead at 49; tested rule on right to die.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():B9. PubMed ID: 11646531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 11644378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.