154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16242904)
1. Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.
Berry DC; Knapp P; Raynor T
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16242904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stroke education: retention effects in those at low- and high-risk of stroke.
Sullivan KA; Katajamaki A
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 18926660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceived risk of medicine side effects in users of a patient information website: a study of the use of verbal descriptors, percentages and natural frequencies.
Knapp P; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; Raynor DK; Woolf E
Br J Health Psychol; 2009 Sep; 14(Pt 3):579-94. PubMed ID: 18992183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.
Knapp P; Raynor DK; Berry DC
Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 15175486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Over the counter medicines and the need for immediate action: a further evaluation of European Commission recommended wordings for communicating risk.
Berry D; Raynor T; Knapp P; Bersellini E
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 May; 53(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15140451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public stigma in health and non-healthcare students: attributions, emotions and willingness to help with adolescent self-harm.
Law GU; Rostill-Brookes H; Goodman D
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Jan; 46(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 18962601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data.
Sheridan SL; Pignone M
Eff Clin Pract; 2002; 5(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11874195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.
Replogle WH; Johnson WD
Fam Med; 2007 Jun; 39(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 17549653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of informed consent format on patient anxiety, knowledge, and satisfaction.
Goldberger JJ; Kruse J; Kadish AH; Passman R; Bergner DW
Am Heart J; 2011 Oct; 162(4):780-785.e1. PubMed ID: 21982673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients' responsiveness to a decision support tool for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in primary care.
van Steenkiste B; van der Weijden TM; Stoffers JH; GROL RP
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jul; 72(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 18395393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients' responses to risk information about the benefits of treating hypertension.
Misselbrook D; Armstrong D
Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Apr; 51(465):276-9. PubMed ID: 11458479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative vs. absolute measures of benefit and risk: what's the difference?
Citrome L
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Feb; 121(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19694632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A tale of two studies: the importance of setting, subjects and context in two randomized, controlled trials of a web-based decision support for perimenopausal and postmenopausal health decisions.
Saver BG; Gustafson D; Taylor TR; Hawkins RP; Woods NF; Dinauer S; Casey S; MacLaren-Loranger A
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 May; 66(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 17317080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A purpose-based evaluation of information for patients: an approach to measuring effectiveness.
Feldman-Stewart D; Brennenstuhl S; Brundage MD
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Mar; 65(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 17014979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Communicating risk--a matter of chance?].
Yoon LS; Nexøe J; Nielsen JB
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Jun; 169(24):2325-8. PubMed ID: 17594851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Apr; 66(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 17137743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient education about anticoagulant medication: is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective?
Mazor KM; Baril J; Dugan E; Spencer F; Burgwinkle P; Gurwitz JH
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):145-57. PubMed ID: 17942268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
