187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16243006)
21. Comment on 'Discrepancies in dbSNP confirmations rates and allele frequency distributions from varying genotyping error rates and patterns'.
Carlson CS; Reider MJ; Nickerson DA; Eberle MA; Kruglyak L
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 15333455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Tree pattern matching in phylogenetic trees: automatic search for orthologs or paralogs in homologous gene sequence databases.
Dufayard JF; Duret L; Penel S; Gouy M; Rechenmann F; Perrière G
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2596-603. PubMed ID: 15713731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new method to localize and test the significance of incongruence: detecting domain shuffling in the nuclear receptor superfamily.
Thornton JW; DeSalle R
Syst Biol; 2000 Jun; 49(2):183-201. PubMed ID: 12118404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Test a clade in phylogenetic trees.
Shi X; Gu H; Field C
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Oct; 23(10):1976-83. PubMed ID: 16857857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DPRml: distributed phylogeny reconstruction by maximum likelihood.
Keane TM; Naughton TJ; Travers SA; McInerney JO; McCormack GP
Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 15513992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.
Huson DH; Bryant D
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 16221896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DRUIDS--detection of regions with unexpected internal deviation from stationarity.
Fedrigo O; Adams DC; Naylor GJ
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2005 Mar; 304(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 15706597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy--the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses.
Dowton M; Austin AD
Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 11943090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Missing the forest for the trees: phylogenetic compression and its implications for inferring complex evolutionary histories.
Ané C; Sanderson M
Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 15805016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. pIQPNNI: parallel reconstruction of large maximum likelihood phylogenies.
Minh BQ; Vinh le S; von Haeseler A; Schmidt HA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(19):3794-6. PubMed ID: 16046495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test.
Dolphin K; Belshaw R; Orme CD; Quicke DL
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Dec; 17(3):401-6. PubMed ID: 11133194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data.
Taylor DJ; Piel WH
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Aug; 21(8):1534-7. PubMed ID: 15140947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. On statistical tests of phylogenetic tree imbalance: the Sackin and other indices revisited.
Blum MG; François O
Math Biosci; 2005 Jun; 195(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15893336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis.
Phillips A; Janies D; Wheeler W
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Sep; 16(3):317-30. PubMed ID: 10991785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A cophylogenetic perspective of RNA-virus evolution.
Jackson AP; Charleston MA
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jan; 21(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 12949128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficient approximations for learning phylogenetic HMM models from data.
Jojic V; Jojic N; Meek C; Geiger D; Siepel A; Haussler D; Heckerman D
Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i161-8. PubMed ID: 15262795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Traversing the tangle: algorithms and applications for cophylogenetic studies.
Charleston MA; Perkins SL
J Biomed Inform; 2006 Feb; 39(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 16226921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Upper bounds on maximum likelihood for phylogenetic trees.
Hendy MD; Holland BR
Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 19 Suppl 2():ii66-72. PubMed ID: 14534174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.
Symonds MR
Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 12227998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Coevolving solutions to the shortest common superstring problem.
Zaritsky A; Sipper M
Biosystems; 2004; 76(1-3):209-16. PubMed ID: 15351144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
