These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16243247)

  • 1. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor.
    Tsuchida R; Araki K; Endo A; Funahashi I; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 16243247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices.
    Sanderink GC; Miles DA
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):249-55, v. PubMed ID: 10740767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
    Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Ludlow J; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors.
    Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital radiography: a survey of pediatric dentists.
    Russo JM; Russo JA; Guelmann M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 17367028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of physical properties of different digital intraoral sensors.
    Al-Rawi W; Teich S
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):e76-83. PubMed ID: 24568289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
    Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Nasstrom K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24404600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wireless continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring during surgery: a pilot study.
    Øyri K; Balasingham I; Samset E; Høgetveit JO; Fosse E
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 16428546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensor-based intraoral digital radiography.
    Khocht A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 16(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 15344581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infection control procedures used in conjunction with computed dental radiography.
    Hubar JS; Gardiner DM
    Int J Comput Dent; 2000 Oct; 3(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 11410973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A CMOS active pixel sensor system for laboratory- based x-ray diffraction studies of biological tissue.
    Bohndiek SE; Cook EJ; Arvanitis CD; Olivo A; Royle GJ; Clark AT; Prydderch ML; Turchetta R; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):655-72. PubMed ID: 18199908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality of film transparency printer output of digital dental radiographs.
    Sakurai T; Matsumoto Y; Onoyama K; Kawamata R; Kashima I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 15772599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of "veraviewpocs" digital panoramic X-ray system.
    Tatsumi M; Yoshiura K; Yuasa K; Tabata O; Nakayama E; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Katoh M; Kanda S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2000 Jul; 3(3):183-95. PubMed ID: 11410969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.
    Chiu HL; Lin SH; Chen CH; Wang WC; Chen JY; Chen YK; Lin LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):749-56. PubMed ID: 18547836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.