These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16243247)
1. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor. Tsuchida R; Araki K; Endo A; Funahashi I; Okano T Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 16243247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices. Sanderink GC; Miles DA Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):249-55, v. PubMed ID: 10740767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography. Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film. Ludlow J; Mol A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors. Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors. Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is digital better in dental radiography? Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital radiography: a survey of pediatric dentists. Russo JM; Russo JA; Guelmann M J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 17367028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of physical properties of different digital intraoral sensors. Al-Rawi W; Teich S Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):e76-83. PubMed ID: 24568289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility. Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Nasstrom K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24404600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wireless continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring during surgery: a pilot study. Øyri K; Balasingham I; Samset E; Høgetveit JO; Fosse E Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 16428546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]