These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16243336)

  • 1. Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of segmental diaphyseal defects: a comparison between resorbable and non-resorbable membranes.
    Nasser NJ; Friedman A; Friedman M; Moor E; Mosheiff R
    Injury; 2005 Dec; 36(12):1460-6. PubMed ID: 16243336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regeneration of segmental diaphyseal defects in sheep tibiae using resorbable polymeric membranes: a preliminary study.
    Gugala Z; Gogolewski S
    J Orthop Trauma; 1999; 13(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 10206250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polylactide membranes in the treatment of segmental diaphyseal defects: animal model experiments in the rabbit radius, sheep tibia, Yucatan minipig radius, and goat tibia.
    Meinig RP
    Injury; 2002 Aug; 33 Suppl 2():B58-65. PubMed ID: 12365366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polylactide membranes and sponges in the treatment of segmental defects in rabbit radii.
    Ip WY
    Injury; 2002 Aug; 33 Suppl 2():B66-70. PubMed ID: 12161321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of NMP-preloaded and dip-loaded membranes for guided bone regeneration of rabbit cranial defects.
    Karfeld-Sulzer LS; Ghayor C; Siegenthaler B; Gjoksi B; Pohjonen TH; Weber FE
    J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2017 Feb; 11(2):425-433. PubMed ID: 24919954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone healing with an in situ-formed bioresorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogel membrane in rabbit calvarial defects.
    Humber CC; Sándor GK; Davis JM; Peel SA; Brkovic BM; Kim YD; Holmes HI; Clokie CM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):372-84. PubMed ID: 20060340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barrier membranes on bone augmentation in rabbit calvaria.
    Ito K; Nanba K; Murai S
    J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1229-37. PubMed ID: 9848532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compartmentalized bone regeneration of cranial defects with biodegradable barriers: an animal model.
    Stal S; Tjelmeland K; Hicks J; Bhatia N; Eppley B; Hollier L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 12(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11314186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) on healing bone defects: a histological study in rabbits.
    Aslan M; Simsek G; Dayi E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 15150639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regeneration of diaphyseal bone defects using resorbable poly(L/DL-lactide) and poly(D-lactide) membranes in the Yucatan pig model.
    Meinig RP; Buesing CM; Helm J; Gogolewski S
    J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Nov; 11(8):551-8. PubMed ID: 9415860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Lee SH; Yoon HJ; Park MK; Kim YS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 19216278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential for guided bone regeneration and bone graft fixation with resorbable membranes in pediatric craniofacial surgery.
    Eppley BL
    J Craniofac Surg; 1997 Mar; 8(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 10332280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Guided bone regeneration by using biodegradable co-polymer membranes in rabbits].
    Huang LF; Liu JG; Xu XX
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Sep; 13(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 12080827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconstruction of septic diaphyseal bone defects with the induced membrane technique.
    Scholz AO; Gehrmann S; Glombitza M; Kaufmann RA; Bostelmann R; Flohe S; Windolf J
    Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S121-4. PubMed ID: 26542857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of guided tissue regeneration on the healing of osseous defects in rat calvaria.
    Bohning BP; Davenport WD; Jeansonne BG
    J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 10204461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes in bone regeneration.
    Marinucci L; Lilli C; Baroni T; Becchetti E; Belcastro S; Balducci C; Locci P
    J Periodontol; 2001 Jun; 72(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 11453237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Osteogenesis mechanism of chitosan-coated calcium sulfate pellets on the restoration of segmental bone defects.
    Cui X; Zhao D; Zhang B; Gao Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1445-50. PubMed ID: 19816276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a collagen membrane combined with a porous titanium membrane on exophytic new bone formation in a rabbit calvarial model.
    Shin SI; Herr Y; Kwon YH; Chung JH
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 22509754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects.
    Dupoirieux L; Pourquier D; Picot MC; Neves M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 11289623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two resorbable membrane systems in bone regeneration after removal of wisdom teeth: a randomized-controlled clinical pilot study.
    Zwahlen RA; Cheung LK; Zheng LW; Chow RL; Li T; Schuknecht B; Grätz KW; Weber FE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1084-91. PubMed ID: 19751357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.