226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16244251)
21. A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: pilot study to reduce bias.
Gordon PB; Borugian MJ; Warren Burhenne LJ
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 17848684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.
Kalager M; Adami HO; Bretthauer M; Tamimi RM
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Apr; 156(7):491-9. PubMed ID: 22473436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists.
Goergen SK; Evans J; Cohen GP; MacMillan JH
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 9205234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection.
Chiarelli AM; Kirsh VA; Klar NS; Shumak R; Jong R; Fishell E; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1856-62. PubMed ID: 17035392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validating regional Hospital Information System data through comparison with a local cancer register to identify interval cancers of a breast screening program.
Sperati A; Pannozzo F; Giorgi Rossi P; Baiocchi D; Barca A; Borgia P
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Jun; 18(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 19238084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.
Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 11517043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Organized breast screening programs in Canada: effect of radiologist reading volumes on outcomes.
Coldman AJ; Major D; Doyle GP; D'yachkova Y; Phillips N; Onysko J; Shumak R; Smith NE; Wadden N
Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):809-15. PubMed ID: 16424236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.
Skaane P; Hofvind S; Skjennald A
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):708-17. PubMed ID: 17709826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of interval cancers observed in an Italian mammography screening programme (2000-2006).
Caumo F; Vecchiato F; Pellegrini M; Vettorazzi M; Ciatto S; Montemezzi S
Radiol Med; 2009 Sep; 114(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 19551342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme.
Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RM
Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11162697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Missed cancers on mammograms: causes and measures of prevention.
Kouskos E; Markopoulos C; Mantas D; Revenas K; Antonopoulou Z; Kontzoglou K; Gogas J
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(2):230-2. PubMed ID: 15032289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers.
Hofvind S; Geller B; Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2008 Nov; 49(9):975-81. PubMed ID: 18785026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast cancer missed at screening; hindsight or mistakes?
Hovda T; Larsen M; Romundstad L; Sahlberg KK; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110913. PubMed ID: 37311339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme.
Saarenmaa I; Salminen T; Geiger U; Holli K; Isola J; Kärkkäinen A; Pakkanen J; Piironen A; Salo A; Hakama M
Eur J Cancer; 1999 Jul; 35(7):1118-22. PubMed ID: 10533457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
