219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16244253)
1. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.
Penedo M; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Carreira JM; Villalón J; Porto G; Seoane C; Vidal JJ; Berbaum KS; Chakraborty DP; Fajardo LL
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):450-7. PubMed ID: 16244253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of JPEG2000 data compression on an automated system for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Penedo M; Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2006 Apr; 10(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 16617624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-performance wavelet compression for mammography: localization response operating characteristic evaluation.
Kallergi M; Lucier BJ; Berman CG; Hersh MR; Kim JJ; Szabunio MS; Clark RA
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 16373759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms.
Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Waldrop SM; D'Orsi CJ
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15983071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yang Y; Rong D; Yao X; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 18608020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of JPEG2000 compression on detection of skull fractures.
McEntee MF; Nikolovski I; Bourne R; Pietrzyk MW; Evanoff MG; Brennan PC; Tay KL
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 23664399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy.
Ringl H; Schernthaner R; Sala E; El-Rabadi K; Weber M; Schima W; Herold CJ; Dixon AK
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 18641251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.
Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Claus F; Celis V; Geniets C; Provost V; Pauwels H; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 19378737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal filter-based detection of microcalcifications.
Gulsrud TO; Husøy JH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 48(11):1272-81. PubMed ID: 11686626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of masses and clustered microcalcifications on data compressed mammograms: an observer performance study.
Good WF; Sumkin JH; Ganott M; Hardesty L; Holbert B; Johns CM; Klym AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Dec; 175(6):1573-6. PubMed ID: 11090378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images.
Sung MM; Kim HJ; Yoo SK; Choi BW; Nam JE; Kim HS; Lee JH; Yoo HS
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 12297972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment.
Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Good WF; Maitz GS; Chang YH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2000 Aug; 7(8):595-602. PubMed ID: 10952109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the fidelity of JPEG2000 compressed CT images using DICOM header information.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee H; Choi H; Jeon JJ; Ahn JH; Lee KH
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6449-57. PubMed ID: 22149828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of lossy data compression in primary interpretation for full-field digital mammography.
Kovacs MD; Reicher JJ; Grotts JF; Reicher MA; Trambert MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):570-5. PubMed ID: 25714287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
