These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Ouwendijk R; de Vries M; Pattynama PM; van Sambeek MR; de Haan MW; Stijnen T; van Engelshoven JM; Hunink MG Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):1094-103. PubMed ID: 16020559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripheral arterial disease: therapeutic confidence of CT versus digital subtraction angiography and effects on additional imaging recommendations. Adriaensen ME; Kock MC; Stijnen T; van Sambeek MR; van Urk H; Pattynama PM; Myriam Hunink MG Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 15358853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Willmann JK; Baumert B; Schertler T; Wildermuth S; Pfammatter T; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Böhm T Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):1083-93. PubMed ID: 16055691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: diagnostic performance and effect on therapeutic management of 64-section CT angiography. Napoli A; Anzidei M; Zaccagna F; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Brachetti G; Cartocci G; Fanelli F; Catalano C; Passariello R Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 21969664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors. Ouwendijk R; Kock MC; van Dijk LC; van Sambeek MR; Stijnen T; Hunink MG Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 16966479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peripheral arterial disease: clinical and cost comparisons between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography--a multicenter randomized trial. de Vries M; Ouwendijk R; Flobbe K; Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; Schurink GH; van der Vliet JA; Heijstraten FM; Cuypers PW; Duijm LE; van Engelshoven JM; Hunink MG; de Haan MW Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 16864668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. Catalano C; Fraioli F; Laghi A; Napoli A; Bezzi M; Pediconi F; Danti M; Nofroni I; Passariello R Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):555-63. PubMed ID: 15128997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for treatment planning in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomised controlled diagnostic trial. Vahl AC; Geselschap J; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Smit J; Sala J; Turkcan K; Dijksman LM; Visser MJ Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 May; 35(5):514-21; discussion 522-3. PubMed ID: 18201915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The costs and effects of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital substraction angiography on quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Bosma J; Dijksman LM; Lam K; Wisselink W; van Swijndregt AD; Vahl A Acta Radiol; 2014 Apr; 55(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 23939383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sixteen-detector row CT angiography for lower-leg arterial occlusive disease: analysis of section width. Schertler T; Wildermuth S; Alkadhi H; Kruppa M; Marincek B; Boehm T Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):649-56. PubMed ID: 16244274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]