These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16244989)

  • 1. Comparison between carcass microbial load recovered by swabbing surfaces of different size and using the reference excision method.
    Miraglia D; Ranucci D; D'Ovidio V; Branciari R; Severini M
    Vet Res Commun; 2005 Aug; 29 Suppl 2():339-41. PubMed ID: 16244989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses.
    Pearce RA; Bolton DJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced control of microbiological contamination of product at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X; Badoni M; Youssef MK; Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 22221368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling microbial contamination on beef and lamb meat during processing.
    Widders PR; Coates KJ; Warner S; Beattie JC; Morgan IR; Hickey MW
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Jun; 72(6):208-11. PubMed ID: 8526812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two sampling techniques for game meat.
    van der Merwe M; Jooste PJ; Hoffman LC; Calitz FJ
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 2013 Mar; 84(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 23718896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct quantification and distribution of tetracycline-resistant genes in meat samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Guarddon M; Miranda JM; Vázquez BI; Cepeda A; Franco CM
    J Food Sci; 2012 Jul; 77(7):M372-6. PubMed ID: 22757711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter to the editor of the international journal of food microbiology.
    Struijk CB; Mossel DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 99(1):113-4. PubMed ID: 15718034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relevance of abattoir hygiene assessment to microbial contamination of British beef carcases.
    Hudson WR; Mead GC; Hinton MH
    Vet Rec; 1996 Dec; 139(24):587-9. PubMed ID: 8981733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proximate sources of bacteria on boneless loins prepared from routinely processed and detained carcasses at a pork packing plant.
    Gill CO; Landers C
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Dec; 97(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 15541803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The use of neck skin for microbial process control of fresh poultry meat using the bioluminescence method].
    Ellerbroek L; Lox C
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 May; 111(5):181-4. PubMed ID: 15233334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surveillance and characterisation by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Cronobacter spp. in farming and domestic environments, food production animals and retail foods.
    Molloy C; Cagney C; O'Brien S; Iversen C; Fanning S; Duffy G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 136(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 19683357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sampling methods for microbiological analysis of red meat and poultry carcasses.
    Capita R; Prieto M; Alonso-Calleja C
    J Food Prot; 2004 Jun; 67(6):1303-8. PubMed ID: 15222570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in the microbial contamination of bovine, ovine and swine carcasses in three small-scale abattoirs in central Italy: A four-year monitoring.
    Petruzzelli A; Osimani A; Pasquini M; Clementi F; Vetrano V; Paolini F; Foglini M; Micci E; Paoloni A; Tonucci F
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():53-9. PubMed ID: 26340741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbial assessment of an upward and downward dehiding technique in a commercial beef processing plant.
    Kennedy TG; Giotis ES; McKevitt AI
    Meat Sci; 2014 Aug; 97(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 24769148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.