These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16245724)

  • 1. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R; Reid CA; Solano SN; Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro system for the comparison of excision and wet-dry swabbing for microbiological sampling of beef carcasses.
    Cenci-Goga BT; Miraglia D; Ranucci D; Branciari R; Budelli L; McCrindle CM; Cioffi A; Mammoli R
    J Food Prot; 2007 Apr; 70(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 17477263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Avery SM; Reid CA; Wilson D; Howell M; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling.
    Ghafir Y; Daube G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 47(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 19241527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella on Turkey carcasses.
    McEvoy JM; Nde CW; Sherwood JS; Logue CM
    J Food Prot; 2005 Jan; 68(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 15690801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Jones T
    J Food Prot; 2000 Feb; 63(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 10678419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hygiene indicator microorganisms for selected pathogens on beef, pork, and poultry meats in Belgium.
    Ghafir Y; China B; Dierick K; De Zutter L; Daube G
    J Food Prot; 2008 Jan; 71(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 18236660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses.
    Pearce RA; Bolton DJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sources and extent of microbiological contamination of beef carcasses in seven United States slaughtering plants.
    Sofos JN; Kochevar SL; Bellinger GR; Buege DR; Hancock DD; Ingham SC; Morgan JB; Reagan JO; Smith GC
    J Food Prot; 1999 Feb; 62(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10030632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the SimPlate method for enumeration of Escherichia coli in swab samples from beef and lamb carcasses.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Skjerve E; Dommarsnes K; Østensvik Ø
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 142(1-2):229-33. PubMed ID: 20659776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of experience with swabbing procedures on the numbers of bacteria recovered from carcasses by swabbing with sponges.
    Gill CO; Badoni M
    J Food Prot; 2010 Apr; 73(4):747-51. PubMed ID: 20377966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presence of Salmonella in the red meat abattoir lairage after routine cleansing and disinfection and on carcasses.
    Small A; James C; James S; Davies R; Liebana E; Howell M; Hutchison M; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2006 Oct; 69(10):2342-51. PubMed ID: 17066911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the hygiene of pig carcasses using whole-body carcass swabs compared with the four-site method in EC Decision 471.
    O'Brien SB; Lenahan M; Sweeney T; Sheridan JJ
    J Food Prot; 2007 Feb; 70(2):432-9. PubMed ID: 17340880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of the principal points of product contamination during beef carcass dressing processes in Northern Ireland.
    Madden RH; Murray KA; Gilmour A
    J Food Prot; 2004 Jul; 67(7):1494-6. PubMed ID: 15270508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of a validated HACCP system for the control of microbiological contamination of pig carcasses at a small abattoir.
    Bryant J; Brereton DA; Gill CO
    Can Vet J; 2003 Jan; 44(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 12619556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.