203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1624625)
1. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Martinez LJ; von Fraunhofer JA
J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun; 7(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9743664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy.
Brosky ME; Pesun IJ; Lowder PD; Delong R; Hodges JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb; 87(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 11854678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
Gökçen-Rohlig B; Ongül D; Sancakli E; Sermet B
Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative evaluation of tray spacer thickness and repeat pour on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impression material: in vitro study.
Kumar S; Yadav D; Yadav R; Arora A
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 24992848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
