These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16246943)

  • 1. Double-blind study on materials testing with applied kinesiology.
    Staehle HJ; Koch MJ; Pioch T
    J Dent Res; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1066-9. PubMed ID: 16246943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A double-blind, randomized study to assess the validity of applied kinesiology (AK) as a diagnostic tool and as a nonlocal proximity effect.
    Schwartz SA; Utts J; Spottiswoode SJ; Shade CW; Tully L; Morris WF; Nachman G
    Explore (NY); 2014; 10(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 24607076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On composite resin materials. Degradation, erosion and possible adverse effects in dentists.
    Ortengren U
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2000; (141):1-61. PubMed ID: 11142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cytotoxic effects of dental bonding substances as a function of degree of conversion.
    Franz A; König F; Lucas T; Watts DC; Schedle A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 18774602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stickiness of dental resin composite materials to steel, dentin and bonded dentin.
    Ertl K; Graf A; Watts D; Schedle A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jan; 26(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 19837452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of different adhesives on work of adhesion between CAD/CAM polymers and resin composite cements.
    Keul C; Müller-Hahl M; Eichberger M; Liebermann A; Roos M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1105-14. PubMed ID: 24613606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of cervical restorations using two resin bonding systems.
    Owens BM; Kaplan I; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 9520779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the biocompatibility of a dental composite product.
    Pătroi D; Gociu M; Prejmerean C; Colceriu L; Silaghi Dumitrescu L; Moldovan M; Naicu V
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2013; 54(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 23771076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dental filling material biocompatibility--is Amalgam the worst in supply?].
    Zimmerli B
    Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Jan; 8(325):195-6. PubMed ID: 22338513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microhardness of dual-polymerizing resin cements and foundation composite resins for luting fiber-reinforced posts.
    Yoshida K; Meng X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 24412184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ.
    Barbosa RP; Pereira-Cenci T; Silva WM; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 22326721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L; Wang X; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Ren Y; Chen Z
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination and Correlation of Depth of Cure of a New Composite Resin Delivery System.
    Owens BM; Slaven ; Phebus JG; Ragain JC
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2015; 95(2):39-44; quiz 45-6. PubMed ID: 27024889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-retest-reliability and validity of the Kinesiology muscle test.
    Lüdtke R; Kunz B; Seeber N; Ring J
    Complement Ther Med; 2001 Sep; 9(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 11926427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early hardness of self-adhesive resin cements cured under indirect resin composite restorations.
    Giráldez I; Ceballos L; Garrido MA; Rodríguez J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Apr; 23(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 21477039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New direct restorative materials].
    Hickel R; Dasch W; Janda R; Tyas M; Anusavice K
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Apr; 106(4):128-40. PubMed ID: 11930356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary. Early hardness of self-adhesive resin cements cured under indirect resin composite restorations.
    Khajotia SS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Apr; 23(2):125. PubMed ID: 21477040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations.
    Besnault C; Attal JP
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12967073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The bond of different post materials to a resin composite cement and a resin composite core material.
    Stewardson D; Shortall A; Marquis P
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):E1-12. PubMed ID: 22856648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.