110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16247128)
1. Peroral CT enterography with lactulose solution: preliminary observations.
Arslan H; Etlik O; Kayan M; Harman M; Tuncer Y; Temizöz O
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 16247128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of computed tomographic enterography with an orally administered lactulose solution in clinically normal dogs.
Keh S; Sohn J; Choi M; Lee N; Jang J; Kim H; Chang D; Choi M; Yoon J
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Apr; 77(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 27027835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel biphasic oral contrast solution for enterographic studies.
Algin O; Evrimler S; Ozmen E; Metin MR; Ocakoglu G; Ersoy O; Karaoglanoglu M; Arslan H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 23321835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A pattern approach to the abnormal small bowel: observations at MDCT and CT enterography.
Macari M; Megibow AJ; Balthazar EJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1344-55. PubMed ID: 17449781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT enterography: technical and interpretive pitfalls.
Barlow JM; Goss BC; Hansel SL; Kolbe AB; Rackham JL; Bruining DH; Fletcher JG
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jun; 40(5):1081-96. PubMed ID: 25652953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT enterography: concept, technique, and interpretation.
Tochetto S; Yaghmai V
Radiol Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 47(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 19195538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparative Study of Four Oral Contrast Agents for Small Bowel Distension with Computed Tomography Enterography.
Leduc F; De A; Rebello R; Muhn N; Ioannidis G
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2015 May; 66(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 25585562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive multidetector computed tomography enterography in patients with small-bowel Crohn's disease: is a 40-second delay better than 70 seconds?
Vandenbroucke F; Mortelé KJ; Tatli S; Pelsser V; Erturk SM; De Mey J; Silverman SG
Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1052-60. PubMed ID: 17963078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy--feasibility study.
Wold PB; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD; Sandborn WJ
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):275-81. PubMed ID: 12944602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR enterography with oral contrast agent composed of methylcellulose, low-dose barium sulfate, sorbitol, and lactulose: assessment of diagnostic performance, reliability, image quality, and patient tolerance.
Evrimler S; Algin O
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 27133698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT enterography: principles, trends, and interpretation of findings.
Elsayes KM; Al-Hawary MM; Jagdish J; Ganesh HS; Platt JF
Radiographics; 2010 Nov; 30(7):1955-70. PubMed ID: 21057129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking)--a feasibility study.
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Schneemann H; Kuehle C; Herborn CU; Goehde SC; Ruehm SG; Goyen M
Eur Radiol; 2005 Oct; 15(10):2079-87. PubMed ID: 16021453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases.
Paulsen SR; Huprich JE; Fletcher JG; Booya F; Young BM; Fidler JL; Johnson CD; Barlow JM; Earnest F
Radiographics; 2006; 26(3):641-57; discussion 657-62. PubMed ID: 16702444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT Enteroclysis.
Maglinte DD; Sandrasegaran K; Lappas JC; Chiorean M
Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):661-71. PubMed ID: 18024448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR enterography in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: retrospective assessment of patient tolerance, image quality, and initial performance estimates.
Absah I; Bruining DH; Matsumoto JM; Weisbrod AJ; Fletcher JG; Fidler JL; Faubion WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):W367-75. PubMed ID: 22915428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.
Matsuoka Y; Masumoto T; Koga H; Suzuki K; Ushimi T; Terada H; Tamura A; Yokoyama Y; Abe K; Kamata N
Radiat Med; 2000; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10972554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An initial experience: using helical CT imaging to detect obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
Miller FH; Hwang CM
Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 15246473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hepatic enhancement and metastatic lesion conspicuity on CT scans: influence of intravenous glucagon and oral CT contrast material.
Warshauer DM; Wehmueller MD; Molina PL; Muller KE; DeLuca MC; Lee JK
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 9015064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
