These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16248350)

  • 1. Assessing the reliability of ordered categorical scales using kappa-type statistics.
    Roberts C; McNamee R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Oct; 14(5):493-514. PubMed ID: 16248350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A matrix of kappa-type coefficients to assess the reliability of nominal scales.
    Roberts C; McNamee R
    Stat Med; 1998 Feb; 17(4):471-88. PubMed ID: 9496723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volumetric analysis of subarachnoid hemorrhage: assessment of the reliability of two computerized methods and their comparison with other radiographic scales.
    Jiménez-Roldán L; Alén JF; Gómez PA; Lobato RD; Ramos A; Munarriz PM; Lagares A
    J Neurosurg; 2013 Jan; 118(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 22998059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighted specific-category kappa measure of interobserver agreement.
    Kvålseth TO
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Dec; 93(3 Pt 2):1283-90. PubMed ID: 14765602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories.
    Brenner H; Kliebsch U
    Epidemiology; 1996 Mar; 7(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 8834562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales.
    Roberts C
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(6):810-30. PubMed ID: 17634968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review.
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2002 Jul; 29(7):527-36. PubMed ID: 12060093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers.
    Cicchetti D; Bronen R; Spencer S; Haut S; Berg A; Oliver P; Tyrer P
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Aug; 194(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 16909062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of analysis-of-variance-based methods to quantify the random variations of observers in medical imaging measurements: guidelines to the investigator.
    Zeggelink WF; Hart AA; Gilhuijs KG
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 15305452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correction for regression dilution bias using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
    Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Zethelius B
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2246-57. PubMed ID: 16969892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Novel "Maximizing Kappa" Approach for Assessing the Ability of a Diagnostic Marker and Its Optimal Cutoff Value.
    Chang CH; Yang JT; Lee MH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):1005-19. PubMed ID: 24918528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical tools to improve assessing agreement between several observers.
    Ruddat I; Scholz B; Bergmann S; Buehring AL; Fischer S; Manton A; Prengel D; Rauch E; Steiner S; Wiedmann S; Kreienbrock L; Campe A
    Animal; 2014 Apr; 8(4):643-9. PubMed ID: 24461060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing dependent kappa coefficients obtained on multilevel data.
    Vanbelle S
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):1016-1034. PubMed ID: 28464322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Interpretation of the Weighted Kappa Coefficients.
    Vanbelle S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 25516203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement.
    Yi Q; Wang PP; He Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2816-25. PubMed ID: 17985364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymptotic variability of (multilevel) multirater kappa coefficients.
    Vanbelle S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3012-3026. PubMed ID: 30132375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The kappa statistic in rehabilitation research: an examination.
    Tooth LR; Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 85(8):1371-6. PubMed ID: 15295769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling agreement on categorical scales in the presence of random scorers.
    Vanbelle S; Lesaffre E
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 26395905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.
    Sim J; Wright CC
    Phys Ther; 2005 Mar; 85(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 15733050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.