236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16248383)
1. Usefulness of noise adaptive non-linear gaussian filter in FDG-PET study.
Nagayoshi M; Murase K; Fujino K; Uenishi Y; Kawamata M; Nakamura Y; Kitamura K; Higuchi I; Oku N; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 19(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 16248383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-Gaussian smoothing of low-count transmission scans for PET whole-body studies.
Pawitan Y; Bettinardi V; Teräs M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jan; 24(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 15638191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise and signal decoupling in maximum-likelihood reconstructions and Metz filters for PET brain images.
Liow JS; Strother SC
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Apr; 39(4):735-50. PubMed ID: 15552081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards tracer dose reduction in PET studies: Simulation of dose reduction by retrospective randomized undersampling of list-mode data.
Gatidis S; Würslin C; Seith F; Schäfer JF; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H
Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 26929936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FDG-PET parametric imaging by total variation minimization.
Guo H; Renaut RA; Chen K; Reiman E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 19261438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET.
Visvikis D; Costa DC; Croasdale I; Lonn AH; Bomanji J; Gacinovic S; Ell PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Mar; 30(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 12634961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection.
Ramos CD; Erdi YE; Gonen M; Riedel E; Yeung HW; Macapinlac HA; Chisin R; Larson SM
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Feb; 28(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 11303885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A phantom for investigation of tumour signal and noise in PET reconstruction with various smoothing filters: experiments and comparisons with simulated intensity diffusion.
Skretting A; Glomset O; Bogsrud TV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):191-4. PubMed ID: 20176733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for on-site measurements of the effective spatial resolution in PET image volumes reconstructed with OSEM and Gaussian post-filters.
Skretting A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 20164108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Super-resolution in PET imaging.
Kennedy JA; Israel O; Frenkel A; Bar-Shalom R; Azhari H
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16468448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardised uptake values from PET/CT images: comparison with conventional attenuation-corrected PET.
Souvatzoglou M; Ziegler SI; Martinez MJ; Busch R; Dzewas G; Schwaiger M; Bengel F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 16953402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SUV correction for injection errors in FDG-PET examination.
Miyashita K; Takahashi N; Oka T; Asakawa S; Lee J; Shizukuishi K; Inoue T
Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 21(10):607-13. PubMed ID: 18092139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastases of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG-PET/CT by optimizing the iteration number for the image reconstruction.
Inoue K; Sato T; Kitamura H; Ito M; Tsunoda Y; Hirayama A; Kurosawa H; Tanaka T; Fukushi M; Moriyama N; Fujii H
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 18670852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner.
Lodge MA; Badawi RD; Gilbert R; Dibos PE; Line BR
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 16391183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of semi-quantitative small-animal PET data with recovery coefficients: a phantom and rat study.
Aide N; Louis MH; Dutoit S; Labiche A; Lemoisson E; Briand M; Nataf V; Poulain L; Gauduchon P; Talbot JN; Montravers F
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Oct; 28(10):813-22. PubMed ID: 17728612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation and evaluation of an ordered subsets reconstruction algorithm for transmission PET studies using median root prior and inter-update median filtering.
Bettinardi V; Alenius S; Numminen P; Teräs M; Gilardi MC; Fazio F; Ruotsalainen U
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Feb; 30(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 12552340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
