These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16248594)

  • 1. Comparison of regulatory method estimated drinking water exposure concentrations with monitoring results from surface drinking water supplies.
    Jackson S; Hendley P; Jones R; Poletika N; Russell M
    J Agric Food Chem; 2005 Nov; 53(22):8840-7. PubMed ID: 16248594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of regulatory estimates of drinking water concentrations with monitoring data.
    Jones RL
    J Agric Food Chem; 2005 Nov; 53(22):8835-9. PubMed ID: 16248593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Historical reconstruction of wastewater and land use impacts to groundwater used for public drinking water: exposure assessment using chemical data and GIS.
    Swartz CH; Rudel RA; Kachajian JR; Brody JG
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 13(5):403-16. PubMed ID: 12973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a terrestrial food chain model.
    Travis CC; Blaylock BP
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1992; 2(2):221-39. PubMed ID: 1515773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncalibrated modelling of conservative tracer and pesticide leaching to groundwater: comparison of potential Tier II exposure assessment models.
    Fox GA; Sabbagh GJ; Chen W; Russell MH
    Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Jun; 62(6):537-50. PubMed ID: 16625679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
    Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Watershed monitoring and modelling and USA regulatory compliance.
    Turner BG; Boner MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):7-12. PubMed ID: 15685974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct influence of filter strips on acute and chronic pesticide aquatic environmental exposure assessments across U.S. EPA scenarios.
    Sabbagh GJ; Muñoz-Carpena R; Fox GA
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 22877937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining occurrence and toxicity information to identify priorities for drinking-water mixture research.
    Ryker SJ; Small MJ
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):653-66. PubMed ID: 18643823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a screening approach to interpret human biomonitoring data on volatile organic compounds: reverse dosimetry on biomonitoring data for trichloroethylene.
    Liao KH; Tan YM; Clewell HJ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Oct; 27(5):1223-36. PubMed ID: 18076492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revised framework for pesticide aquatic environmental exposure assessment that accounts for vegetative filter strips.
    Sabbagh GJ; Fox GA; Muñoz-Carpena R; Lenz MF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3839-45. PubMed ID: 20394426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A methodology for estimating human exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA): a retrospective exposure assessment of a community (1951-2003).
    Paustenbach DJ; Panko JM; Scott PK; Unice KM
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2007 Jan; 70(1):28-57. PubMed ID: 17162497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of detection limits in drinking water regulation.
    Calder RS; Schmitt KA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(21):8008-14. PubMed ID: 20925425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EPA's exposure assessment tools and models.
    Daniels W; Lee S; Miller A
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Feb; 18(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 12519680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Essentials of environmental health. Enhancing your occupational health nursing practice (Part II).
    Chalupka SM
    AAOHN J; 2001 Apr; 49(4):194-212; quiz 213-4. PubMed ID: 11760524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of simulated pesticide concentrations in surface drinking water with monitoring data: explanations for observed differences and proposals for a new regulatory modeling approach.
    Winchell MF; Snyder NJ
    J Agric Food Chem; 2014 Jan; 62(2):348-59. PubMed ID: 24328205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of noncancer risk assessment approaches for use in deriving drinking water criteria.
    Gibson MC; deMonsabert SM; Orme-Zavaleta J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Dec; 26(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 9441915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Major contributors to inorganic arsenic intake in southeastern Michigan.
    Meliker JR; Franzblau A; Slotnick MJ; Nriagu JO
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2006 Sep; 209(5):399-411. PubMed ID: 16731038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in Southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA.
    Slotnick MJ; Meliker JR; Nriagu JO
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Oct; 369(1-3):42-50. PubMed ID: 16750243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the mass balance model used by the Environmental Protection Agency for estimating inhalation exposure to new chemical substances.
    Fehrenbacher MC; Hummel AA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Jun; 57(6):526-36. PubMed ID: 8651073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.