These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16248703)

  • 1. Age-related differences in the processing of redundant visual dimensions.
    Bucur B; Madden DJ; Allen PA
    Psychol Aging; 2005 Sep; 20(3):435-46. PubMed ID: 16248703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference and facilitation in spatial working memory: age-associated differences in lure effects in the n-back paradigm.
    Schmiedek F; Li SC; Lindenberger U
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 19290752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
    Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Redundancy gain and coactivation in bimodal detection: evidence for the preservation of coactive processing in older adults.
    Bucur B; Allen PA; Sanders RE; Ruthruff E; Murphy MD
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2005 Sep; 60(5):P279-82. PubMed ID: 16131623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: parallel-coactive processing of dimensions is location specific.
    Krummenacher J; Müller HJ; Heller D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1303-22. PubMed ID: 12542129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial and temporal processing in healthy aging: implications for perceptions of driving skills.
    Conlon E; Herkes K
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Jul; 15(4):446-70. PubMed ID: 18584339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Directed forgetting and aging: the role of retrieval processes, processing speed, and proactive interference.
    Hogge M; Adam S; Collette F
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Jul; 15(4):471-91. PubMed ID: 18584340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of age-related changes in inhibition and binding using eye movement monitoring.
    Ryan JD; Leung G; Turk-Browne NB; Hasher L
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 17563180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress-related cognitive interference predicts cognitive function in old age.
    Stawski RS; Sliwinski MJ; Smyth JM
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):535-44. PubMed ID: 16953715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the attention cascade model to probe cognitive aging.
    Shih SI
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Sep; 24(3):550-62. PubMed ID: 19739911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of attention in binding visual features in working memory: evidence from cognitive ageing.
    Brown LA; Brockmole JR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):2067-79. PubMed ID: 20446186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in what is viewed and remembered in complex conjunction search.
    Williams CC; Zacks RT; Henderson JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):946-66. PubMed ID: 18932061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dividing attention between color and shape revisited: redundant targets coactivate only when parts of the same perceptual object.
    Mordkoff JT; Danek RH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 21258912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
    Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age and binding within-dimension features in visual short-term memory.
    Parra MA; Abrahams S; Logie RH; Sala SD
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jan; 449(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18977410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.
    Lange EB; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions.
    Krummenacher J; Müller HJ; Heller D
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):901-17. PubMed ID: 11521855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age differences in stroop interference in working memory.
    McCabe DP; Robertson CL; Smith AD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):633-44. PubMed ID: 16019640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual attention and coactivation of response decisions for features from different dimensions.
    Feintuch U; Cohen A
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Jul; 13(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 12137140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.