These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16248736)

  • 1. Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):811-29. PubMed ID: 16248736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting category intuitiveness with the rational model, the simplicity model, and the generalized context model.
    Pothos EM; Bailey TM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1062-80. PubMed ID: 19586270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):275-92. PubMed ID: 11911384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models.
    Olsson H; Wennerholm P; Lyxzèn U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):936-41. PubMed ID: 15238035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.
    Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements are not a prerequisite for learning movement sequence timing through observation.
    Hayes SJ; Timmis MA; Bennett SJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 19500770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting.
    Kruschke JK; Kappenman ES; Hetrick WP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):830-45. PubMed ID: 16248737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Meier KM
    Cognition; 2009 Aug; 112(2):330-6. PubMed ID: 19481733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exemplar representation without generalization? Comment on Smith and Minda's (2000) "Thirty categorization results in search of a model".
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1735-43. PubMed ID: 11185793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterizing rule-based category learning deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Filoteo JV; Maddox WT; Ing AD; Song DD
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 16978666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time course of visual attention in infant categorization of cats versus dogs: evidence for a head bias as revealed through eye tracking.
    Quinn PC; Doran MM; Reiss JE; Hoffman JE
    Child Dev; 2009; 80(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 19236398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attending to eye movements and retinal eccentricity: evidence for the activity distribution model of attention reconsidered.
    Turk-Browne NB; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1061-6. PubMed ID: 16262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond nonutilization: irrelevant cues can gate learning in probabilistic categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):530-50. PubMed ID: 19331506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.