BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16248750)

  • 1. Selective interference with the use of visual images in the symbolic distance paradigm.
    Dean GM; Dewhurst SA; Morris PE; Whittaker A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1043-68. PubMed ID: 16248750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images constructed from verbal descriptions: a study of individual differences in the mental comparison of distances.
    Denis M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 17658445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concreteness effects revisited: the influence of dynamic visual noise on memory for concrete and abstract words.
    Parker A; Dagnall N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 19358014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interval for interference in conscious visual imagery.
    Quinn JG; McConnell J
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):241-52. PubMed ID: 16484113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: do pictures provide privileged access?
    Amrhein PC; McDaniel MA; Waddill P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 12219794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues.
    Brass M; Bekkering H; Wohlschläger A; Prinz W
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Nov; 44(2):124-43. PubMed ID: 11041986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial forms and mental imagery.
    Price MC
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1229-45. PubMed ID: 19665116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The shape of words in the brain.
    Kovic V; Plunkett K; Westermann G
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 19828141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A model of response time effects in symbolic comparison.
    Leth-Steensen C; Marley AA
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Jan; 107(1):62-100. PubMed ID: 10687403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of hunger and visuo-spatial interference on imagery-induced food cravings.
    Steel D; Kemps E; Tiggemann M
    Appetite; 2006 Jan; 46(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 16364497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention switching function of memory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 18031856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in visual imagery determine how event information is remembered.
    Sheldon S; Amaral R; Levine B
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):360-369. PubMed ID: 27149558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of gaze-aversion on visual-spatial imagination.
    Markson L; Paterson KB
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 100(Pt 3):553-63. PubMed ID: 19021925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of imagined and synaesthetic colours.
    Rich AN; Williams MA; Puce A; Syngeniotis A; Howard MA; McGlone F; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):2918-25. PubMed ID: 16901521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative BOLD in sensory cortices during verbal memory: a component in generating internal representations?
    Azulay H; Striem E; Amedi A
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):221-31. PubMed ID: 19326203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orienting of visual attention among persons with autism spectrum disorders: reading versus responding to symbolic cues.
    Landry O; Mitchell PL; Burack JA
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2009 Jul; 50(7):862-70. PubMed ID: 19527316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the distinctiveness of visual imagery and motor imagery in a reach paradigm.
    Gabbard C; Ammar D; Cordova A
    Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 19116842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
    Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.