These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16248758)

  • 1. The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.
    Roediger HL; Marsh EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1155-9. PubMed ID: 16248758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
    Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD
    Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing.
    Marsh EJ; Roediger HL; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Apr; 14(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 17694900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):918-28. PubMed ID: 18605878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests.
    Fazio LK; Agarwal PK; Marsh EJ; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 20516221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Older, not younger, children learn more false facts from stories.
    Fazio LK; Marsh EJ
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):1081-9. PubMed ID: 17540354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion.
    Brown AS; Brown CM; Mosbacher JL; Dryden WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17087580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.
    Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 18491500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All of the above: When multiple correct response options enhance the testing effect.
    Bishara AJ; Lanzo LA
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25122187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting.
    Little JL; Bjork EL; Bjork RA; Angello G
    Psychol Sci; 2012; 23(11):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
    Gettig JP
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clarification of the memory artefact in the assessment of suggestibility.
    Willner P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Apr; 52(Pt 4):318-26. PubMed ID: 18339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.
    Marsh EJ; Fazio LK; Goswick AE
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):899-906. PubMed ID: 22891857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):553-71. PubMed ID: 17087573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective implementation of correction for guessing in oral and maxillofacial pathology multiple-choice examinations: did student performance improve?
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 18923095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
    Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.