151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16250468)
1. Comparative evaluation of an II based and a flat panel based cardiovascular fluoroscopy system within a clinical environment.
Grewal RK; McLean ID
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 16250468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Difference in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector in peripheral angiography and the effect of BMI.
Wiesinger B; Kirchner S; Blumenstock G; Herz K; Schmehl J; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J
Rofo; 2013 Feb; 185(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23196837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.
Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products.
Wiesinger B; Stütz A; Schmehl J; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr; 198(4):946-54. PubMed ID: 22451565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?
Bogaert E; Bacher K; Lapere R; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 18789622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
Berliner L; Buffa A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternate line erasure and readout (ALER) method for implementing slot-scan imaging technique with a flat-panel detector--initial experiences.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Altunbas MC; Wang T
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Apr; 25(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 16608064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
Dimov A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
