BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16253082)

  • 1. Evaluation of long-term implant success.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Herzberg R; Levin L
    J Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16253082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism.
    Behneke A; Behneke N; d'Hoedt B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 12507239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. part 1: marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up.
    Finne K; Rompen E; Toljanic J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 17465347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant marginal bone loss in maxillary sinus grafts.
    Herzberg R; Dolev E; Schwartz-Arad D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 16519188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal bone loss in dental implants subjected to early loading (6 to 8 weeks postplacement) with a retrospective short-term follow-up.
    Boronat A; Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Marti E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 18201603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term clinical results of Nobel Direct implants: a retrospective multicentre analysis.
    Sennerby L; Rocci A; Becker W; Jonsson L; Johansson LA; Albrektsson T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 18237314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results.
    Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 17991252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology.
    Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peri-implant bone loss around posterior mandible dental implants placed after distraction osteogenesis: preliminary findings.
    Polo WC; de Araujo NS; Lima YB; Joly JC; Sendyk WR; Cury PR
    J Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 17274707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year follow-up report.
    Behneke A; Behneke N; d'Hoedt B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):633-45. PubMed ID: 11055130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts.
    Levin L; Nitzan D; Schwartz-Arad D
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 78(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 17199534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On marginal bone level changes around dental implants.
    Coli P; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Apr; 23(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 33463007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of plaque and/or excessive loading on marginal soft and hard tissue reactions around Brånemark implants: a review of literature and experience.
    De Smet E; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Aug; 21(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 11519707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
    Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis.
    Laurell L; Lundgren D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Mar; 13(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 19681932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year.
    Shin YK; Han CH; Heo SJ; Kim S; Chun HJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 17066642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants.
    Weber HP; Crohin CC; Fiorellini JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 11168205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients.
    Carlsson GE; Lindquist LW; Jemt T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 11203645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A bone quality-based implant system: first year of prosthetic loading.
    Misch CE; Dietsh-Misch F; Hoar J; Beck G; Hazen R; Misch CM
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(3):185-97. PubMed ID: 10551149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.