BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16253512)

  • 21. Histomorphometric analysis of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
    Lawler ME; Tayebaty FT; Williams WB; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20561467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Establishment of the animal models of mandibular distraction osteogenesis].
    Wei M; Zhang DS; Feng SZ
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 13(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 12080842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intermittent parathyroid hormone (1-34) enhances mechanical strength and density of new bone after distraction osteogenesis in rats.
    Seebach C; Skripitz R; Andreassen TT; Aspenberg P
    J Orthop Res; 2004 May; 22(3):472-8. PubMed ID: 15099623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of bone regenerative capacity following distraction osteogenesis of goat mandibles using two different bone cutting techniques.
    Nooh N; Abdullah WA; El-Awady Grawish M; Ramalingam S; Hassan G; Javed F; Al-Hezaimi K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23810515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bilateral mandibular distraction in adult dogs with an epiperiosteal distractor.
    Hasse AR; Pörksen M; Zimmermann CE
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15749209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of osteoformin on mineralisation and quality of newly formed bone during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
    Pampu AA; Ozkaynak O; Senel FC; Cankaya M; Dolanmaz D; Ersöz S; Avunduk MC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):833-7. PubMed ID: 19828342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone regeneration and fracture healing. Experience with distraction osteogenesis model.
    Richards M; Goulet JA; Weiss JA; Waanders NA; Schaffler MB; Goldstein SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355 Suppl):S191-204. PubMed ID: 9917639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study.
    Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 18675208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.
    Nagashima LK; Rondon-Newby M; Zakhary IE; Nagy WW; Zapata U; Dechow PC; Opperman LA; Elsalanty ME
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 21601342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Manipulating the mandibular distraction site at different stages of consolidation.
    Wei S; Scadeng M; Yamashita DD; Pollack H; Faridi O; Tran B; Shuler C; Yen S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 65(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 17448830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intermittent loading improves results in mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis.
    Consolo U; Bertoldi C; Zaffe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16584414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
    Boccaccio A; Cozzani M; Pappalettere C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20709724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unexpected absence of effect of rhBMP-7 on distraction osteogenesis.
    Sailhan F; Chotel F; Chousta A; Viguier E; Boivin G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():227-34. PubMed ID: 17159580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of a new curvilinear distractor to repair mandibular defects in dogs.
    Shang H; Lin X; Du J; He L; Liu Y
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 21470726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transcription factor osterix modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance callus formation during distraction osteogenesis.
    Lai QG; Yuan KF; Xu X; Li DR; Li GJ; Wei FL; Yang ZJ; Luo SL; Tang XP; Li S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Apr; 111(4):412-9. PubMed ID: 20813560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distraction osteogenesis after membranous bone onlay grafting in a dog model.
    Cho BC; Seo MS; Baik BS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Sep; 59(9):1025-33. PubMed ID: 11526572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Histology of the regenerate and docking site in bone transport.
    Garcia FL; Picado CH; Garcia SB
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Apr; 129(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 18297297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of low-intensity ultrasound stimulation on consolidation of the regenerate zone in a rat model of distraction osteogenesis.
    Eberson CP; Hogan KA; Moore DC; Ehrlich MG
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2003; 23(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12499942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery.
    Meyer U; Kleinheinz J; Joos U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 32(3):140-9. PubMed ID: 15113571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of distraction rates on expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Cheung LK; Zheng LW; Ma L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 34(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 16781161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.