74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16253782)
1. 3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer.
Dewitt KD; Hsu IC; Speight J; Weinberg VK; Lessard E; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1270-4. PubMed ID: 16253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated treatment planning framework for brachytherapy of cervical cancer using 3D dose predictions.
Kallis K; Moore LC; Cortes KG; Brown D; Mayadev J; Moore KL; Meyers SM
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(8):. PubMed ID: 36898161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two planning systems for HDR brachytherapy gynecological application.
Elhanafy OA; Migahed MD; Sakr HA; Ellithy M; Das RK; Odau HJ; Thomadsen BR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 11602007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Inverse Dose Optimization Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy.
Wang X; Wang P; Tang B; Kang S; Hou Q; Wu Z; Gou C; Li L; Orlandini L; Lang J; Li J
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():564580. PubMed ID: 33194640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent developments and best practice in brachytherapy treatment planning.
Lee CD
Br J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 87(1041):20140146. PubMed ID: 24734939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomography-based treatment planning for high-dose-rate brachytherapy using the tandem and ring applicator: influence of applicator choice on organ dose and inter-fraction adaptive planning.
Dumane VA; Yuan Y; Sheu RD; Gupta V
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2017 Jun; 9(3):279-286. PubMed ID: 28725253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robustness of IPSA optimized high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans to catheter displacements.
Poder J; Whitaker M
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2016 Jun; 8(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 27504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of failure modes and effects analyses and time for brachytherapy ring and tandem applicator digitization between manual and solid applicator source placement methods.
Holtman AL; DiCostanzo DJ; Zimmerman CA; Graeper G; Woollard J; Christ DF; Cetnar AJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14336. PubMed ID: 38664983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment planning for multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy of breast cancer - from Paris system to anatomy-based inverse planning.
Major T; Polgár C
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2017 Feb; 9(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 28344609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Commissioning of brachytherapy module of Oncentra MasterPlan treatment planning system.
de Oliveira CA; Lopes MD; Matos A
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2009 Dec; 1(4):224-230. PubMed ID: 28050176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Optimization Algorithms Used in Interstitial Brachytherapy of Cervical Carcinoma.
Srivastava S; Singh N; Kashyap VK
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2022 Aug; 12(4):339-348. PubMed ID: 36059288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of manual forward planning with uniform dwell times versus volume-based inverse planning in interstitial brachytherapy of cervical malignancies.
Palled SR; Radhakrishna NK; Manikantan S; Khanum H; Venugopal BK; Vishwanath L
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2020; 25(6):851-855. PubMed ID: 32982589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of graphical optimization and inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Tang B; Liu X; Wang X; Kang S; Wang P; Li J; Orlandini LC
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2019 Aug; 11(4):379-383. PubMed ID: 31523240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of dwell time homogeneity error weight parameter on treatment plan quality in inverse optimized high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy using SagiPlan.
Mosleh-Shirazi MA; Shahcheraghi-Motlagh E; Gholami MH; Shakibafard A; Karbasi S; Fardid R
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2019 Jun; 11(3):256-266. PubMed ID: 31435433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Error analysis of applicator position for combined internal/external radiation therapy in cervical cancer.
Ying W; Liang L; Wang Y; Qi GH
Oncol Lett; 2018 Sep; 16(3):3611-3613. PubMed ID: 30127968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of graphical optimization or IPSA for improving brachytheraphy plans associated with inadequate target coverage for cervical cancer.
Liu Z; Liang H; Wang X; Yang H; Deng Y; Luo T; Yang C; Lu M; Fu Q; Zhu X
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16423. PubMed ID: 29180703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy.
Cho M; Wu X; Dadkhah H; Yi J; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Xu W
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5384-5392. PubMed ID: 28744870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
