These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16253946)

  • 21. The effects of social interactions with in-vehicle agents on a driver's anger level, driving performance, situation awareness, and perceived workload.
    Jeon M; Walker BN; Gable TM
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Sep; 50():185-99. PubMed ID: 25959334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system.
    Li Y; Wang H; Wang W; Liu S; Xiang Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 26761633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ironies of vehicle feedback in car design.
    Walker GH; Stanton NA; Young MS
    Ergonomics; 2006 Feb; 49(2):161-79. PubMed ID: 16484143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving.
    Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing driver's mental representation of Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and its possible effects on behavioural adaptations.
    Piccinini GF; Simões A; Rodrigues CM; Leitão M
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4396-401. PubMed ID: 22317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Knowledge of and trust in advanced driver assistance systems.
    DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106121. PubMed ID: 33882402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.
    Verberne FM; Ham J; Midden CJ
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 23156624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Driver's behavioral adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): the case of speed and time headway.
    Bianchi Piccinini GF; Rodrigues CM; Leitão M; Simões A
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():77-84. PubMed ID: 24913490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The detection of drowsiness using a driver monitoring system.
    Schwarz C; Gaspar J; Miller T; Yousefian R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S157-S161. PubMed ID: 31381433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Driving with a Congestion Assistant; mental workload and acceptance.
    Brookhuis KA; van Driel CJ; Hof T; van Arem B; Hoedemaeker M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Nov; 40(6):1019-25. PubMed ID: 18823875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a 3M (mistakes, mentoring, and mastery) training program for transfer of control situations in a level 2 automated driving system.
    Roberts SC; Hanson W; Ebadi Y; Talreja N; Knodler MA; Fisher DL
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Apr; 116():104215. PubMed ID: 38176134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changing drivers' minds: the evaluation of an advanced driver coaching system.
    Stanton NA; Walker GH; Young MS; Kazi T; Salmon PM
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1209-34. PubMed ID: 17558666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can the traffic locus of control (T-LOC) scale be successfully used to predict Swedish drivers' speeding behaviour?
    Warner HW; Ozkan T; Lajunen T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1113-7. PubMed ID: 20441820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of highly automated driving on the self-perception of drivers in the context of Conduct-by-Wire.
    Kauer M; Franz B; Maier A; Bruder R
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):321-34. PubMed ID: 25343710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions.
    Eriksson A; Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():227-234. PubMed ID: 28342410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing workload through physiological measurements in bus drivers using an automated system during docking.
    Collet C; Petit C; Champely S; Dittmar A
    Hum Factors; 2003 winter; 45(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 15055452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):776-86. PubMed ID: 18329433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.