These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale with radiofrequency: acute and intermediate term results in 144 patients. Sievert H; Ruygrok P; Salkeld M; Baumgartner H; Meier B; Windecker S; Juliard JM; Aubry P; Tiefenbacher C; Krumsdorf U; Vermeersch P; Ewert P; Piéchaud JF Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 73(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 19133667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patent foramen ovale: the evident paradox between the apparently simple treatment and the really complex pathophysiology. Rigatelli G J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Apr; 8(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 17413311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictors and clinical outcomes of residual shunt in patients undergoing percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale. Zajarias A; Thanigaraj S; Lasala J; Perez J J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 18(11):533-7. PubMed ID: 17090816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale, as secondary prevention of cryptogenic cerebral event]. Temesvári A; Bálint OH; Liptai C; Kancz S; Németh B; Szatmári A Orv Hetil; 2006 Oct; 147(42):2035-9. PubMed ID: 17165604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incidence of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults. Spies C; Khandelwal A; Timmermanns I; Schräder R Am J Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 102(7):902-6. PubMed ID: 18805119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of results of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for paradoxical embolism in patients with versus without thrombophilia. Giardini A; Donti A; Formigari R; Bronzetti G; Prandstraller D; Bonvicini M; Palareti G; Guidetti D; Gaddi O; Picchio FM Am J Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 94(8):1012-6. PubMed ID: 15476614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of interatrial septal defect in adults: procedural outcome and long-term results. Kefer J; Sluysmans T; Hermans C; El Khoury R; Lambert C; Van de Wyngaert F; Ovaert C; Pasquet A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 79(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 21523898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recurrent events following patent foramen ovale closure in patients above 55 years of age with presumed paradoxical embolism. Spies C; Khandelwal A; Timmemanns I; Kavinsky CJ; Schräder R; Hijazi ZM Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Dec; 72(7):966-70. PubMed ID: 18942060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A suture not always the ideal solution: problems encountered in developing a suture-based PFO closure technique. Majunke N; Baranowski A; Zimmermann W; Heinisch C; Wilson N; Robertson G; Wunderlich N; Sievert H Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 73(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 19085919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and brain magnetic resonance imaging follow-up after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Vigna C; Inchingolo V; Giannatempo G; Pacilli MA; Di Viesti P; Fusilli S; Amico CM; Santoro T; Lanna P; Fanelli R; Simone P; Loperfido F Am J Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 101(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 18359330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolic events: acute results from the FORECAST registry. Alameddine F; Block PC Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Aug; 62(4):512-6. PubMed ID: 15274163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]