BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16254088)

  • 1. Democracy justifies the means: political group structure moderates the perceived legitimacy of intergroup aggression.
    Falomir-Pichastor JM; Staerklé C; Depuiset MA; Butera F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1683-95. PubMed ID: 16254088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voice in political decision-making: the effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions.
    Terwel BW; Harinck F; Ellemers N; Daamen DD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 20565202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison focus in intergroup comparisons: who we compare to whom influences who we see as powerful and agentic.
    Bruckmüller S; Abele AE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1424-35. PubMed ID: 20841435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ingroup vitality and intergroup attitudes in a linguistic minority.
    Liebkind K; Jasinskaja-Lahti I; Teräsaho M
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Oct; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 17877556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Group decision-making in animals.
    Conradt L; Roper TJ
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6919):155-8. PubMed ID: 12520299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Devaluing domains in response to threatening intergroup comparisons: perceived legitimacy and the status value asymmetry.
    Schmader T; Major B; Eccleston CP; McCoy SK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 May; 80(5):782-96. PubMed ID: 11374749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Democracy under uncertainty: the wisdom of crowds and the free-rider problem in group decision making.
    Kameda T; Tsukasaki T; Hastie R; Berg N
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):76-96. PubMed ID: 20822292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relations between high and low power groups: the importance of legitimacy.
    Hornsey MJ; Spears R; Cremers I; Hogg MA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Feb; 29(2):216-27. PubMed ID: 15272949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Post-decision consolidation in large group decision-making.
    Bäck EA; Esaiasson P; Gilljam M; Svenson O; Lindholm T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):320-8. PubMed ID: 21401620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
    Leach CW; Iyer A; Pedersen A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1232-45. PubMed ID: 16902242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.
    Paladino MP; Castelli L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The roles of ingroup identification and outgroup entitativity in intergroup retribution.
    Stenstrom DM; Lickel B; Denson TF; Miller N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1570-82. PubMed ID: 18716042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.
    Leung K; Tong KK; Lind EA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 17352604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What happens when groups say sorry: the effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients.
    Philpot CR; Hornsey MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):474-87. PubMed ID: 18340033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Support for religio-political aggression among teenaged boys in Gaza: Part I: psychological findings.
    Victoroff J; Quota S; Adelman JR; Celinska B; Stern N; Wilcox R; Sapolsky RM
    Aggress Behav; 2010; 36(4):219-31. PubMed ID: 20540161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporary versus permanent group membership: how the future prospects of newcomers affect newcomer acceptance and newcomer influence.
    Rink FA; Ellemers N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):764-75. PubMed ID: 19329494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between moral reasoning, provictim attitudes, and interpersonal aggression among imprisoned young offenders.
    Palmer EJ; Begum A
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Aug; 50(4):446-57. PubMed ID: 16837453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How are social identities linked to self-conception and intergroup orientation? The moderating effect of implicit theories.
    Hong YY; Chan G; Chiu CY; Wong RY; Hansen IG; Lee SL; Tong YY; Fu HY
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Dec; 85(6):1147-60. PubMed ID: 14674820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of bystander intentions and social-moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression.
    Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2015 Nov; 33(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 26058823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the automatic association between America and aggression for news watchers.
    Ferguson MJ; Hassin RR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1632-47. PubMed ID: 18000099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.