These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1625454)

  • 21. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitometric comparison of dental films of groups D and E.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 6956842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Characteristic curves of dental x-ray film.
    Havukainen R; Servomaa A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jul; 62(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 3460001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing the sensitometric properties of dental X-ray films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 126(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 7897103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of six intra-oral X-ray films.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8617390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
    Price C; McDonnell D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of Flow and Kodak dental X-ray films by means of perceptibility curves.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8498162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Niobi-X filtration in intraoral radiology.
    White SC; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Dec; 72(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 1812457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical recommendations for the use of D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Halse A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 3066808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of processing variables on the contrast of type D and type E dental film.
    Kogon S; Sephens R; Reid J; MacDonald J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1985; 14(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 3861423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7835508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing E- and D-speed film: the effects of various storage conditions on fogging.
    Nesbit S; Platin E; Phillips C; Matteson S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Feb; 126(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 7860889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiographic trends of dental offices and dental schools.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; Conway B; Hart JC; Boyce PR; Antonsen RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):1104-10. PubMed ID: 10422407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. E-speed film.
    Emery C
    Br Dent J; 1997 May; 182(10):372. PubMed ID: 9185352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.