246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16254740)
1. Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
Smith AC; Greene E
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):505-26. PubMed ID: 16254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of defendant conduct on jury damage awards.
Greene E; Johns M; Smith A
J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 11393436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
Crocker CB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of jury instructions on the fusion of liability and compensatory damages.
Wissler RL; Rector KA; Saks MJ
Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 11419378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
Antonio ME
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni F; Brown TR
Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
Cooper J; Hall J
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial.
Golding JM; Bradshaw GS; Dunlap EE; Hodell EC
Child Maltreat; 2007 May; 12(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 17446571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The court of public opinion: lay perceptions of polygraph testing.
Myers B; Latter R; Abdollahi-Arena MK
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 16718577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
Louden JE; Skeem JL
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee's allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer.
Wuensch KL; Moore CH
J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15074507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of liability information, severity of injury, and attitudes toward vengeance on damage awards.
Woody WD
Psychol Rep; 2008 Feb; 102(1):239-58. PubMed ID: 18481684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
Peter-Hagene L
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
