These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16254740)

  • 21. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of victim characteristics on potential jurors' perceptions of brain damage in mild traumatic brain injury.
    Guilmette TJ; Temple RO; Kennedy ML; Weiler MD; Ruffolo LF; Dufresne E
    Brain Inj; 2005 Nov; 19(12):1027-30. PubMed ID: 16263645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Does the sleep apnoea sufferer act grossly negligent according to paragraph 81 of the new German Insurance Contract Act (VVG) when he causes a traffic accident through microsleep?].
    Fromm IE
    Pneumologie; 2009 Apr; 63(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 19259915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What's half a lung worth? Civil jurors' accounts of their award decision making.
    Mott NL; Hans VP; Simpson L
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):401-19. PubMed ID: 10974800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The power of meaningful numbers: Attorney guidance and jury deliberation improve the reliability and gist validity of damage awards.
    Reed K; Hans VP; Rotenstein V; Helm RK; Rodriguez A; McKendall P; Reyna VF
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):83-103. PubMed ID: 38602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mock jurors' reactions to selective presentation of evidence from multiple-opportunity searches.
    Koehler JJ; Thompson WC
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):455-68. PubMed ID: 16786400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Separating compensatory and punitive damage award decisions by trial bifurcation.
    Shea Adams CM; Bourgeois MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16729206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The occupational hazards of jury duty.
    Kaplan SM; Winget C
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 1421562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case.
    Cass SA; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 19579260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
    Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Damage awards and jurors' responsibility ascriptions in medical versus automobile negligence cases.
    Vidmar N; Lee J; Cohen E; Stewart A
    Behav Sci Law; 1994; 12(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 10150702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do juries listen to jury instructions?
    Berger SH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):565-70. PubMed ID: 9460044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Compensating plaintiffs and punishing defendants: is bifurcation necessary?
    Greene E; Woody WD; Winter R
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 10810838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The consolidation of plaintiffs: the effects of number of plaintiffs on jurors' liability decisions, damage awards, and cognitive processing of evidence.
    Horowitz IA; Bordens KS
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):909-18. PubMed ID: 11125655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.